Actually Existing Socialism Enjoyer
@bigdialecticenergy.bsky.social
He/him, Teamster, a silly goofy guy who enjoys eating a good cheese or two and seeing the successes of the anti-colonial, anti-imperialist, and anti-capitalist struggles. Join a union, uphold BDS, get organized, and defeat the liberal who lives inside you.
Someone who works for ICE, you mean
November 21, 2025 at 3:31 AM
Someone who works for ICE, you mean
How can you comment on an idea you have not engaged with?
Why should I take your misspelled ramblings seriously or in good faith when you prefer to retreat into your own phantasms?
Why should I take your misspelled ramblings seriously or in good faith when you prefer to retreat into your own phantasms?
November 19, 2025 at 1:08 AM
How can you comment on an idea you have not engaged with?
Why should I take your misspelled ramblings seriously or in good faith when you prefer to retreat into your own phantasms?
Why should I take your misspelled ramblings seriously or in good faith when you prefer to retreat into your own phantasms?
Yes, I ignored your irrelevant question and clarified my argument using an example, because you don't seem to want to engage with the actual arguments that I or other left critics of the Democratic party are making. You seem to prefer to tilt against windmills. I'm sure that's more fun, to be fair.
November 19, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Yes, I ignored your irrelevant question and clarified my argument using an example, because you don't seem to want to engage with the actual arguments that I or other left critics of the Democratic party are making. You seem to prefer to tilt against windmills. I'm sure that's more fun, to be fair.
If I asked you how electing Democrats is going to eliminate capitalism and white supremacy and colonialism and climate change, not only would you not be able to answer, you shouldn't humor the question. Because I would be asking you to prove a claim you never even made, it's a waste of time.
November 18, 2025 at 11:58 PM
If I asked you how electing Democrats is going to eliminate capitalism and white supremacy and colonialism and climate change, not only would you not be able to answer, you shouldn't humor the question. Because I would be asking you to prove a claim you never even made, it's a waste of time.
Well you asked me to provide examples supporting a claim I did not make, which means you're either disingenuous and think this is a way to get a win, or you're just a dummy and don't really understand what the people around you are saying. Either way, your question doesn't warrant an answer.
November 18, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Well you asked me to provide examples supporting a claim I did not make, which means you're either disingenuous and think this is a way to get a win, or you're just a dummy and don't really understand what the people around you are saying. Either way, your question doesn't warrant an answer.
Your reading comprehension keeps failing you I fear.
What I said was we can look at how the Democrats have failed to advance the aims of the people.
For instance, the BDS movement has made some real successes with divestment from Israel in the rise, in spite of the Democrats hostility v Palestinians
What I said was we can look at how the Democrats have failed to advance the aims of the people.
For instance, the BDS movement has made some real successes with divestment from Israel in the rise, in spite of the Democrats hostility v Palestinians
November 18, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Your reading comprehension keeps failing you I fear.
What I said was we can look at how the Democrats have failed to advance the aims of the people.
For instance, the BDS movement has made some real successes with divestment from Israel in the rise, in spite of the Democrats hostility v Palestinians
What I said was we can look at how the Democrats have failed to advance the aims of the people.
For instance, the BDS movement has made some real successes with divestment from Israel in the rise, in spite of the Democrats hostility v Palestinians
At the very least, we have to conclude that electing Democrats doesn't work if the Democrats are not interested in progress for the multinational working class and the multi-class oppressed nationalities movements.
In order for something to work, it has to center the demands of those movements
In order for something to work, it has to center the demands of those movements
November 18, 2025 at 7:36 PM
At the very least, we have to conclude that electing Democrats doesn't work if the Democrats are not interested in progress for the multinational working class and the multi-class oppressed nationalities movements.
In order for something to work, it has to center the demands of those movements
In order for something to work, it has to center the demands of those movements
I could look at the New Deal and the Great Society and say that getting Democrats elected works. But the Democrat Jimmy Carter started the deregulatory frenzy that destroyed the New Deal, and the Democrat Bill Clinton sabotaged the welfare provisions of the Great Society. Did that work?
November 18, 2025 at 7:33 PM
I could look at the New Deal and the Great Society and say that getting Democrats elected works. But the Democrat Jimmy Carter started the deregulatory frenzy that destroyed the New Deal, and the Democrat Bill Clinton sabotaged the welfare provisions of the Great Society. Did that work?
Yeah, that's an entirely disingenuous position. If I were to put forward an actual vision of change, regardless of how rooted it may be in historical and present movements, you've made it entirely subject to your own sense of the vibe (which is wildly off).
Like, works in what way?
Like, works in what way?
November 18, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Yeah, that's an entirely disingenuous position. If I were to put forward an actual vision of change, regardless of how rooted it may be in historical and present movements, you've made it entirely subject to your own sense of the vibe (which is wildly off).
Like, works in what way?
Like, works in what way?
Right because unless I do not share your blinkered view of the country I must be foreign to it. Solid reasoning
November 18, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Right because unless I do not share your blinkered view of the country I must be foreign to it. Solid reasoning
Then I do not know where you have been for the last like fifty years? Seventy years?
November 18, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Then I do not know where you have been for the last like fifty years? Seventy years?
Mine and the reality we all inhabit, yes.
Again, all the shit I said is just true. I'm sure it does not agree with the narrative you've adopted where there is somehow a good party that ever gets to rule in the fucking United States of America, but it's on you to pick a better narrative.
Again, all the shit I said is just true. I'm sure it does not agree with the narrative you've adopted where there is somehow a good party that ever gets to rule in the fucking United States of America, but it's on you to pick a better narrative.
November 18, 2025 at 3:49 AM
Mine and the reality we all inhabit, yes.
Again, all the shit I said is just true. I'm sure it does not agree with the narrative you've adopted where there is somehow a good party that ever gets to rule in the fucking United States of America, but it's on you to pick a better narrative.
Again, all the shit I said is just true. I'm sure it does not agree with the narrative you've adopted where there is somehow a good party that ever gets to rule in the fucking United States of America, but it's on you to pick a better narrative.
And entirely decoupled from reality
November 18, 2025 at 3:45 AM
And entirely decoupled from reality
To avoid revealing the unhinged state of the mind which contains your opinions, probably.
Or you could try just getting it right the first time
Or you could try just getting it right the first time
November 18, 2025 at 3:43 AM
To avoid revealing the unhinged state of the mind which contains your opinions, probably.
Or you could try just getting it right the first time
Or you could try just getting it right the first time
Nothing I said was in any way wrong or untrue, nor was it nonsensical.
It is extremely funny for you to say that someone else seems insane or is talking nonsense while you can't spell your own deranged shit. I kind of hope this is a bit, it would be less sad if it were a bit.
It is extremely funny for you to say that someone else seems insane or is talking nonsense while you can't spell your own deranged shit. I kind of hope this is a bit, it would be less sad if it were a bit.
November 18, 2025 at 3:39 AM
Nothing I said was in any way wrong or untrue, nor was it nonsensical.
It is extremely funny for you to say that someone else seems insane or is talking nonsense while you can't spell your own deranged shit. I kind of hope this is a bit, it would be less sad if it were a bit.
It is extremely funny for you to say that someone else seems insane or is talking nonsense while you can't spell your own deranged shit. I kind of hope this is a bit, it would be less sad if it were a bit.
You seem to be having a hard time.
Not sure where I ranted, or where I said the Dems were pure evil. I said that, like the Republicans, they are a party of the capitalist class.
Also not sure why you seem to think that monopoly capitalism at home is unrelated to imperialism abroad. You seem confused
Not sure where I ranted, or where I said the Dems were pure evil. I said that, like the Republicans, they are a party of the capitalist class.
Also not sure why you seem to think that monopoly capitalism at home is unrelated to imperialism abroad. You seem confused
November 18, 2025 at 3:19 AM
You seem to be having a hard time.
Not sure where I ranted, or where I said the Dems were pure evil. I said that, like the Republicans, they are a party of the capitalist class.
Also not sure why you seem to think that monopoly capitalism at home is unrelated to imperialism abroad. You seem confused
Not sure where I ranted, or where I said the Dems were pure evil. I said that, like the Republicans, they are a party of the capitalist class.
Also not sure why you seem to think that monopoly capitalism at home is unrelated to imperialism abroad. You seem confused
So because we remember how the Democratic candidate promised to always provide Israel with the means to commit genocide and joined in Republican hysteria, and thought and still think those were bad things to do, we must be foreign robots?
November 18, 2025 at 3:10 AM
So because we remember how the Democratic candidate promised to always provide Israel with the means to commit genocide and joined in Republican hysteria, and thought and still think those were bad things to do, we must be foreign robots?
Pretty sure the way y'all did it in 2024 was to promise to never stop Israel from committing genocide, and, in a roundabout way, fulfill that promise
November 18, 2025 at 3:07 AM
Pretty sure the way y'all did it in 2024 was to promise to never stop Israel from committing genocide, and, in a roundabout way, fulfill that promise
I find myself getting frustrated at your insistence on learning the wrong lesson from the failure of Harris's campaign
November 18, 2025 at 12:22 AM
I find myself getting frustrated at your insistence on learning the wrong lesson from the failure of Harris's campaign
Hmmm, I don't know that I said all losing campaigns are incompetent, I said that this particular campaign was incompetent, and that losing is certainly a sign that the campaign wasn't so hot. Not sure why that's a statement you're so hostile to.
November 18, 2025 at 12:04 AM
Hmmm, I don't know that I said all losing campaigns are incompetent, I said that this particular campaign was incompetent, and that losing is certainly a sign that the campaign wasn't so hot. Not sure why that's a statement you're so hostile to.
I think the argument that the campaign was incompetent is pretty well supported by the fact that it lost.
The idea that the only electorally relevant similarity between Harris's failure and Clinton's failure is that both were women, is deeply misogynistic.
The idea that the only electorally relevant similarity between Harris's failure and Clinton's failure is that both were women, is deeply misogynistic.
November 17, 2025 at 11:50 PM
I think the argument that the campaign was incompetent is pretty well supported by the fact that it lost.
The idea that the only electorally relevant similarity between Harris's failure and Clinton's failure is that both were women, is deeply misogynistic.
The idea that the only electorally relevant similarity between Harris's failure and Clinton's failure is that both were women, is deeply misogynistic.
And China will still do it first and better, because, unlike Silicon Valley weirdos, their engineers are trying to create a product and not the God Which Dwelleth in The Machine
November 17, 2025 at 11:29 PM
And China will still do it first and better, because, unlike Silicon Valley weirdos, their engineers are trying to create a product and not the God Which Dwelleth in The Machine
I think the real risk is of running a candidate whose campaign is based on winning the votes of republicans who will never ever vote for a Democrat, and actively telling voters from the party's base to get fucked despite absolutely relying on them to operate and win the campaign.
November 17, 2025 at 11:26 PM
I think the real risk is of running a candidate whose campaign is based on winning the votes of republicans who will never ever vote for a Democrat, and actively telling voters from the party's base to get fucked despite absolutely relying on them to operate and win the campaign.
And Democrats have been a major partner in destroying labor, in collaborating with Reaganite freaks, in making this a nation hostile to labor. They've been gleeful redbaiters and islamophobes and homophobes, happy to tarnish the name of anyone fighting for progress.
November 17, 2025 at 11:13 PM
And Democrats have been a major partner in destroying labor, in collaborating with Reaganite freaks, in making this a nation hostile to labor. They've been gleeful redbaiters and islamophobes and homophobes, happy to tarnish the name of anyone fighting for progress.
Intelligent working people know that the Democrats are in fact not in our side. Intelligent working people know that both parties are beholden to the Capitalist class, but occasionally when Democrats think it is momentarily advantageous to do so, they offer us a less raw deal
November 17, 2025 at 11:09 PM
Intelligent working people know that the Democrats are in fact not in our side. Intelligent working people know that both parties are beholden to the Capitalist class, but occasionally when Democrats think it is momentarily advantageous to do so, they offer us a less raw deal