@bibci.bsky.social
Nope. It's on the way down.
Happy, now?
Happy, now?
January 27, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Nope. It's on the way down.
Happy, now?
Happy, now?
January 27, 2025 at 2:01 AM
I think that's backwards.
He's calling out the dem's lack of commitment to policies that actually contrast with the GOP.
That leads to an aversion to promote those policies aggressively-the messaging failure.
Poor commitment to good policy hobbles the party's efforts to communicate effectively.
He's calling out the dem's lack of commitment to policies that actually contrast with the GOP.
That leads to an aversion to promote those policies aggressively-the messaging failure.
Poor commitment to good policy hobbles the party's efforts to communicate effectively.
January 5, 2025 at 8:25 PM
I think that's backwards.
He's calling out the dem's lack of commitment to policies that actually contrast with the GOP.
That leads to an aversion to promote those policies aggressively-the messaging failure.
Poor commitment to good policy hobbles the party's efforts to communicate effectively.
He's calling out the dem's lack of commitment to policies that actually contrast with the GOP.
That leads to an aversion to promote those policies aggressively-the messaging failure.
Poor commitment to good policy hobbles the party's efforts to communicate effectively.
1000%
But I think Willis' core point is this. The dems "lesser evilism" only works when the GOP clearly shits the bed. Thinking the dems just need to message lesser evilism better isn't the answer.
But I think Willis' core point is this. The dems "lesser evilism" only works when the GOP clearly shits the bed. Thinking the dems just need to message lesser evilism better isn't the answer.
January 5, 2025 at 8:08 PM
1000%
But I think Willis' core point is this. The dems "lesser evilism" only works when the GOP clearly shits the bed. Thinking the dems just need to message lesser evilism better isn't the answer.
But I think Willis' core point is this. The dems "lesser evilism" only works when the GOP clearly shits the bed. Thinking the dems just need to message lesser evilism better isn't the answer.
Are those mutually exclusive?
I did read the article and think this part is the key. No amount of communication or messaging is going to matter unless the party gets this right.
I did read the article and think this part is the key. No amount of communication or messaging is going to matter unless the party gets this right.
January 5, 2025 at 6:23 PM
Are those mutually exclusive?
I did read the article and think this part is the key. No amount of communication or messaging is going to matter unless the party gets this right.
I did read the article and think this part is the key. No amount of communication or messaging is going to matter unless the party gets this right.
It's ironic that he (correctly) complains about dem's inept communication but adopts an inaccurate, lazy "Blue MAGA" frame that is sure to alienate the people that need to hear the part he 100% nails:
January 5, 2025 at 5:04 PM
It's ironic that he (correctly) complains about dem's inept communication but adopts an inaccurate, lazy "Blue MAGA" frame that is sure to alienate the people that need to hear the part he 100% nails: