Yeah, but that's the best that can be hoped for really. Park-level leadership has so little control, the best we can ask for is that they're advocating for things we want to see—and it seems like they are.

- There are a couple current rides on the "target list" that could be replaced/reimagined in the years ahead

- Concepts have been drawn up for the Mäch Tower site, but nothing slated immediately

- Pantheon theming could be a future opportunity

- Will have plans to celebrate upcoming Das Festhaus and Killarney anniversaries

- Ideas being kicked around for Pet Shenanigans theater—not imminent but new animal shows are on the ideas list

- Developing new system for speeding up parking booth situation—work has already been done, but no imminent plans

- Nothing new for Water Country USA to announce immediately

- Pushing for something new in Da Vinci's Garden, but nothing at the moment

Yeah, the AI imagery usage is just so painfully cringe. It's also astonishing just how poorly executed it has been. I understand the desire to produce quick, easy, and cheap visuals for a survey like this, but it could have been executed far better. Would like to see the AI use disclaimed as well.

A screenshot from the Le Mans sequel (along with two of the others you didn't get) are in this post if you're curious: parkfans.net/threads/park...

The AI slop "art" burns. We couldn't bring ourselves to include it in the article.

I'd prefer Corkscrew, but I think Questor may have fewer rights issues to work through.

I've long thought BGW needs exactly that. I, too, would die for that job but alas...

For the record, it isn't without precedent—even outside of the major theme parks. Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk has an archives department and official historian on staff.

I definitely exclaimed "Houston!" Busch Gardens Houston never gets any justice.

Presentation was great overall, but there were a couple fact errors. 🤓