Ben Greiner
@bgreiner.bsky.social
Experimental economist @ WU Vienna, interested in trust in markets, bargaining, political economy, methods, open science.
Reinforcement learning. Curve. Dang, I did it again.
November 8, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Reinforcement learning. Curve. Dang, I did it again.
“… wie kaum kein anderer …” ist doppelte Verneinung. —> “kaum ein anderer”
November 1, 2025 at 9:14 PM
“… wie kaum kein anderer …” ist doppelte Verneinung. —> “kaum ein anderer”
1-3 are fun as opposed to 4 “writing it up in a way such that nasty reviewed do not have enough ammunition to shoot it down during peer review.
August 16, 2025 at 8:02 PM
1-3 are fun as opposed to 4 “writing it up in a way such that nasty reviewed do not have enough ammunition to shoot it down during peer review.
Reminds me of: Your cousin has published a letter to the editor in our local newspaper. Why don’t you publish in a proper newspaper rather than those obscure journals?
August 16, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Reminds me of: Your cousin has published a letter to the editor in our local newspaper. Why don’t you publish in a proper newspaper rather than those obscure journals?
A title generator for those doing experimental behavioral research: ben.orsee.org/plosomat/
July 6, 2025 at 5:30 PM
A title generator for those doing experimental behavioral research: ben.orsee.org/plosomat/
Are you delving into controversy here? Rest assured: LLM will also influence how we write and speak.
May 14, 2025 at 2:33 PM
Are you delving into controversy here? Rest assured: LLM will also influence how we write and speak.
I agree that such carelessness is bad. But I have also seen several cases where an IRB forbid researchers to share any data (even cleaned/anonymous) for blanket privacy reasons. That’s bad too. There is a difficult trade-off/conflict between transparency ethics and privacy ethics, needing balancing.
May 13, 2025 at 8:32 PM
I agree that such carelessness is bad. But I have also seen several cases where an IRB forbid researchers to share any data (even cleaned/anonymous) for blanket privacy reasons. That’s bad too. There is a difficult trade-off/conflict between transparency ethics and privacy ethics, needing balancing.
Das Problem ist, dass es bei opt-out real nicht zu mehr Organspenden kommt, da die Familien das letzte Wort haben und aufgrund von opt-out nicht genau wissen, was der Verstorbene explizit gewollt hätte. “Forced choice” (z.B. beim Beantragen eines Ausweises/Führerscheins) würde besser funktionieren.
April 11, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Das Problem ist, dass es bei opt-out real nicht zu mehr Organspenden kommt, da die Familien das letzte Wort haben und aufgrund von opt-out nicht genau wissen, was der Verstorbene explizit gewollt hätte. “Forced choice” (z.B. beim Beantragen eines Ausweises/Führerscheins) würde besser funktionieren.
Recalibrated my belief to pre-article prior due to the retraction. Will not attend parent-teacher-meetings anymore.
March 27, 2025 at 10:23 PM
Recalibrated my belief to pre-article prior due to the retraction. Will not attend parent-teacher-meetings anymore.