@beyondvoyager.bsky.social
Here for the common sense.
Staying for the Environmental and Economic policies to solve climate justice and wealth inequality.
Staying for the Environmental and Economic policies to solve climate justice and wealth inequality.
That is the sound of the US being lapped by the rest of the world.
December 23, 2025 at 2:40 AM
That is the sound of the US being lapped by the rest of the world.
"The best jobs for introverts... tend to have high stakes and big responsibilities, but relatively low demands on social skills and performative prowess in meetings."
Glad Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, or Meryl Streep didn't read your article when looking for jobs.
Glad Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, or Meryl Streep didn't read your article when looking for jobs.
December 22, 2025 at 11:24 PM
"The best jobs for introverts... tend to have high stakes and big responsibilities, but relatively low demands on social skills and performative prowess in meetings."
Glad Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, or Meryl Streep didn't read your article when looking for jobs.
Glad Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, or Meryl Streep didn't read your article when looking for jobs.
Hey Daniel and USA Today, tell me you have NO CLUE what introversion is without saying it:
"You lack an expansive personality. You never pipe up in meetings. You would make an absolutely terrible salesperson. You abhor public speaking."
It is not a flaw, it is preference, assholes.
"You lack an expansive personality. You never pipe up in meetings. You would make an absolutely terrible salesperson. You abhor public speaking."
It is not a flaw, it is preference, assholes.
December 22, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Hey Daniel and USA Today, tell me you have NO CLUE what introversion is without saying it:
"You lack an expansive personality. You never pipe up in meetings. You would make an absolutely terrible salesperson. You abhor public speaking."
It is not a flaw, it is preference, assholes.
"You lack an expansive personality. You never pipe up in meetings. You would make an absolutely terrible salesperson. You abhor public speaking."
It is not a flaw, it is preference, assholes.
Watching Ben Bernake clips pre-crisis of 2008 as a pre-game to 2026....
December 21, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Watching Ben Bernake clips pre-crisis of 2008 as a pre-game to 2026....
Stop reading articles that recycle advice from other years of articles that promise the same thing.
Then ask: "Could someone else do this job just as well as me?"
If your answer is "No" - You are a manager that no one wants to work for.
Then ask: "Could someone else do this job just as well as me?"
If your answer is "No" - You are a manager that no one wants to work for.
December 19, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Stop reading articles that recycle advice from other years of articles that promise the same thing.
Then ask: "Could someone else do this job just as well as me?"
If your answer is "No" - You are a manager that no one wants to work for.
Then ask: "Could someone else do this job just as well as me?"
If your answer is "No" - You are a manager that no one wants to work for.
Kicking that can....
December 8, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Kicking that can....
Rubio: "We are much further ahead today than what we were this morning..."
If I start a 5K run 120K behind the start line, then run 20K, I too would be further ahead from what I was that morning- but I would still be 100K from the START LINE.
If I start a 5K run 120K behind the start line, then run 20K, I too would be further ahead from what I was that morning- but I would still be 100K from the START LINE.
November 23, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Rubio: "We are much further ahead today than what we were this morning..."
If I start a 5K run 120K behind the start line, then run 20K, I too would be further ahead from what I was that morning- but I would still be 100K from the START LINE.
If I start a 5K run 120K behind the start line, then run 20K, I too would be further ahead from what I was that morning- but I would still be 100K from the START LINE.
So the opposite of the original, non-profit, vision of emphasizing open collaboration, safety research, and transparency by sharing results, tools, and code openly to prevent the concentration of AI power?
Cool, cool.
Cool, cool.
November 23, 2025 at 10:09 PM
So the opposite of the original, non-profit, vision of emphasizing open collaboration, safety research, and transparency by sharing results, tools, and code openly to prevent the concentration of AI power?
Cool, cool.
Cool, cool.
Like a scene out of Role Models: "That's not me."
November 23, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Like a scene out of Role Models: "That's not me."
Rules for these 285 House Members:
Rule 1: Keep Them Away from Bright Light
Rule 2: Never Get Them Wet
Rule 3: Never Feed Them After Midnight
...or is that Gremlins...
Side Note to those 86: Whatever you do, DO NOT type in a search bar "Sweden, Denmark, Norway" or dare use...
Rule 1: Keep Them Away from Bright Light
Rule 2: Never Get Them Wet
Rule 3: Never Feed Them After Midnight
...or is that Gremlins...
Side Note to those 86: Whatever you do, DO NOT type in a search bar "Sweden, Denmark, Norway" or dare use...
November 23, 2025 at 9:50 PM
Rules for these 285 House Members:
Rule 1: Keep Them Away from Bright Light
Rule 2: Never Get Them Wet
Rule 3: Never Feed Them After Midnight
...or is that Gremlins...
Side Note to those 86: Whatever you do, DO NOT type in a search bar "Sweden, Denmark, Norway" or dare use...
Rule 1: Keep Them Away from Bright Light
Rule 2: Never Get Them Wet
Rule 3: Never Feed Them After Midnight
...or is that Gremlins...
Side Note to those 86: Whatever you do, DO NOT type in a search bar "Sweden, Denmark, Norway" or dare use...
and for every 5% increase in default, loss to shareholder equity grows significantly.
So, ↑ in defaults in BDCs could:
- ↑ investor losses
- ↓ confidence in private markets
- ↓ funding opportunities for small business
- ↑ small business failures
- ↑ unemployment
Here is the article used:
So, ↑ in defaults in BDCs could:
- ↑ investor losses
- ↓ confidence in private markets
- ↓ funding opportunities for small business
- ↑ small business failures
- ↑ unemployment
Here is the article used:
Ignoring Reality or Overreacting? Semiliquid Funds Versus BDCs
BDCs have sold off significantly—what does that mean for their semiliquid counterparts?
www.morningstar.com
November 23, 2025 at 7:32 PM
and for every 5% increase in default, loss to shareholder equity grows significantly.
So, ↑ in defaults in BDCs could:
- ↑ investor losses
- ↓ confidence in private markets
- ↓ funding opportunities for small business
- ↑ small business failures
- ↑ unemployment
Here is the article used:
So, ↑ in defaults in BDCs could:
- ↑ investor losses
- ↓ confidence in private markets
- ↓ funding opportunities for small business
- ↑ small business failures
- ↑ unemployment
Here is the article used:
It's another sign cracks are showing in the background.
Apologize if you already know this: BDCs are funds that pool money from regular investors (private credit) to lend or invest in small, growing businesses.
And approx $60B worth are in 'semiliquid' funds (locked for months/years, not daily)
Apologize if you already know this: BDCs are funds that pool money from regular investors (private credit) to lend or invest in small, growing businesses.
And approx $60B worth are in 'semiliquid' funds (locked for months/years, not daily)
November 23, 2025 at 7:32 PM
It's another sign cracks are showing in the background.
Apologize if you already know this: BDCs are funds that pool money from regular investors (private credit) to lend or invest in small, growing businesses.
And approx $60B worth are in 'semiliquid' funds (locked for months/years, not daily)
Apologize if you already know this: BDCs are funds that pool money from regular investors (private credit) to lend or invest in small, growing businesses.
And approx $60B worth are in 'semiliquid' funds (locked for months/years, not daily)
2025 total so far: 162.21 billion.
By Maturity
1m to 2Y: $85.94 billion
2Y to 3Y: $7.45 billion
3Y to 5Y: $14.90 b
5Y to 7Y: $8.67 b
7Y to 10Y: $2.24 b
10Y to 20Y: $18.00 b
20Y to 30Y: $18.79 b
1Y to 7.5Y (TIPS): $2.50 b
7.5Y to 30Y (TIPS): $2.09 b
10Y to 30Y (TIPS): $0.14 b
By Maturity
1m to 2Y: $85.94 billion
2Y to 3Y: $7.45 billion
3Y to 5Y: $14.90 b
5Y to 7Y: $8.67 b
7Y to 10Y: $2.24 b
10Y to 20Y: $18.00 b
20Y to 30Y: $18.79 b
1Y to 7.5Y (TIPS): $2.50 b
7.5Y to 30Y (TIPS): $2.09 b
10Y to 30Y (TIPS): $0.14 b
Buyback Announcements & Results Press Releases — TreasuryDirect
Tentative Buyback Schedule
www.treasurydirect.gov
November 22, 2025 at 6:09 PM
2025 total so far: 162.21 billion.
By Maturity
1m to 2Y: $85.94 billion
2Y to 3Y: $7.45 billion
3Y to 5Y: $14.90 b
5Y to 7Y: $8.67 b
7Y to 10Y: $2.24 b
10Y to 20Y: $18.00 b
20Y to 30Y: $18.79 b
1Y to 7.5Y (TIPS): $2.50 b
7.5Y to 30Y (TIPS): $2.09 b
10Y to 30Y (TIPS): $0.14 b
By Maturity
1m to 2Y: $85.94 billion
2Y to 3Y: $7.45 billion
3Y to 5Y: $14.90 b
5Y to 7Y: $8.67 b
7Y to 10Y: $2.24 b
10Y to 20Y: $18.00 b
20Y to 30Y: $18.79 b
1Y to 7.5Y (TIPS): $2.50 b
7.5Y to 30Y (TIPS): $2.09 b
10Y to 30Y (TIPS): $0.14 b
Headline misses the point the "boost" will find the pockets always intended while baiting favor and a sense of choice to the recipient. It should read:
"Landlord gives back half the extra rent they charged last month to help you pay for this month."
"Landlord gives back half the extra rent they charged last month to help you pay for this month."
November 18, 2025 at 5:44 PM
Headline misses the point the "boost" will find the pockets always intended while baiting favor and a sense of choice to the recipient. It should read:
"Landlord gives back half the extra rent they charged last month to help you pay for this month."
"Landlord gives back half the extra rent they charged last month to help you pay for this month."
I feel hands down the quickest way to change affordable housing is majority elimination of housing as a speculative asset. Would need to address value adjustment for non-commercial (like upside down mortgages), but value is artificially elevated.
Would this Step 1 supercharge "Housing First"?
Would this Step 1 supercharge "Housing First"?
November 12, 2025 at 8:54 PM
I feel hands down the quickest way to change affordable housing is majority elimination of housing as a speculative asset. Would need to address value adjustment for non-commercial (like upside down mortgages), but value is artificially elevated.
Would this Step 1 supercharge "Housing First"?
Would this Step 1 supercharge "Housing First"?
Multiple stressors are continuing to build....
November 12, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Multiple stressors are continuing to build....
"Give the subsidies that go to the insurers (so people do not pay out of pocket), and give that directly to the people so they can use the money to *checks notes* pay their healthcare insurers."
November 9, 2025 at 12:50 AM
"Give the subsidies that go to the insurers (so people do not pay out of pocket), and give that directly to the people so they can use the money to *checks notes* pay their healthcare insurers."
There is SO MUCH material for future students looking to complete a thesis in Behavioral Science in these 28 seconds alone.
November 5, 2025 at 9:38 PM
There is SO MUCH material for future students looking to complete a thesis in Behavioral Science in these 28 seconds alone.
Along with this would partial elimination of utilizing housing as a speculative asset further supercharge affordability? I would assume streamlining makes it easy to make more housing but without complementary policies preventing use as investment, you could still have an affordability issue, right?
November 5, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Along with this would partial elimination of utilizing housing as a speculative asset further supercharge affordability? I would assume streamlining makes it easy to make more housing but without complementary policies preventing use as investment, you could still have an affordability issue, right?
2024:
UK energy sector avg profit margin: +23%
Increase % of energy prices: +2.8%
So.. shift public funds from a program that reduces long-term energy costs and demand (benefiting citizens and the climate) to one that provides short-term bill pay that maintains/increases profit for energy sector?
UK energy sector avg profit margin: +23%
Increase % of energy prices: +2.8%
So.. shift public funds from a program that reduces long-term energy costs and demand (benefiting citizens and the climate) to one that provides short-term bill pay that maintains/increases profit for energy sector?
November 5, 2025 at 8:58 PM
2024:
UK energy sector avg profit margin: +23%
Increase % of energy prices: +2.8%
So.. shift public funds from a program that reduces long-term energy costs and demand (benefiting citizens and the climate) to one that provides short-term bill pay that maintains/increases profit for energy sector?
UK energy sector avg profit margin: +23%
Increase % of energy prices: +2.8%
So.. shift public funds from a program that reduces long-term energy costs and demand (benefiting citizens and the climate) to one that provides short-term bill pay that maintains/increases profit for energy sector?
Ending projects abruptly and loss of scientists ensures a distrust for GENERATIONS. Decades at best.
Most research lasts several years start to finish.
Scientists want stability to see them through.
ESA, EU, UNEP, etc welcoming them with open arms.
We just let go of the wheel of our future.
Most research lasts several years start to finish.
Scientists want stability to see them through.
ESA, EU, UNEP, etc welcoming them with open arms.
We just let go of the wheel of our future.
November 4, 2025 at 7:36 PM
Ending projects abruptly and loss of scientists ensures a distrust for GENERATIONS. Decades at best.
Most research lasts several years start to finish.
Scientists want stability to see them through.
ESA, EU, UNEP, etc welcoming them with open arms.
We just let go of the wheel of our future.
Most research lasts several years start to finish.
Scientists want stability to see them through.
ESA, EU, UNEP, etc welcoming them with open arms.
We just let go of the wheel of our future.