Beteille
@beteille.bsky.social
Coincidentally she has as many Instagram followers as Charlie Kirk
October 6, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Coincidentally she has as many Instagram followers as Charlie Kirk
Then quit posting about him.
October 6, 2025 at 7:39 PM
Then quit posting about him.
Will miss all 3 bluesky users in Mississippi
August 25, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Will miss all 3 bluesky users in Mississippi
How did you buy them if they're banned
April 24, 2025 at 12:03 AM
How did you buy them if they're banned
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
April 21, 2025 at 4:01 PM
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
Dont use apostrophes Also no periods
I get it, though, Europe never met a regulation it didn't like.
Doesn't exactly put the continent at the top of the economic heap — for its businesses or its citizens.
Doesn't exactly put the continent at the top of the economic heap — for its businesses or its citizens.
March 5, 2025 at 10:14 PM
I get it, though, Europe never met a regulation it didn't like.
Doesn't exactly put the continent at the top of the economic heap — for its businesses or its citizens.
Doesn't exactly put the continent at the top of the economic heap — for its businesses or its citizens.
Do you really not understand that free speech can be in any language?
More than 67 million people in the US speak a language other than English in their homes.
The “official language” edict doesn’t even bar agencies from offering interpreters or non-English documents.
So what’s the point of it?
More than 67 million people in the US speak a language other than English in their homes.
The “official language” edict doesn’t even bar agencies from offering interpreters or non-English documents.
So what’s the point of it?
March 5, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Do you really not understand that free speech can be in any language?
More than 67 million people in the US speak a language other than English in their homes.
The “official language” edict doesn’t even bar agencies from offering interpreters or non-English documents.
So what’s the point of it?
More than 67 million people in the US speak a language other than English in their homes.
The “official language” edict doesn’t even bar agencies from offering interpreters or non-English documents.
So what’s the point of it?
Consumer "protection" laws and agencies do more harm than good, and favor bigger operators who can afford to comply with byzantine regulation. See any "too big to fail" policies.
March 5, 2025 at 10:06 PM
Consumer "protection" laws and agencies do more harm than good, and favor bigger operators who can afford to comply with byzantine regulation. See any "too big to fail" policies.
Protests are speech, and they're lawful. You're thinking of riots.
Why would he threaten to do something and then never do it?
And why would you support someone like that?
Why would he threaten to do something and then never do it?
And why would you support someone like that?
March 5, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Protests are speech, and they're lawful. You're thinking of riots.
Why would he threaten to do something and then never do it?
And why would you support someone like that?
Why would he threaten to do something and then never do it?
And why would you support someone like that?
Then why bother making English “official?” Or threatening to take legal action against anonymous speech? And against masked protestors?
“Free” but not for thee.
“Free” but not for thee.
March 5, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Then why bother making English “official?” Or threatening to take legal action against anonymous speech? And against masked protestors?
“Free” but not for thee.
“Free” but not for thee.
What piece of punctuation is …three commas?
March 5, 2025 at 8:38 PM
What piece of punctuation is …three commas?
Still playing by their cute little (ineffective) rules
March 5, 2025 at 8:34 PM
Still playing by their cute little (ineffective) rules
It’s hard to truly understand fictional beings.
March 5, 2025 at 8:17 PM
It’s hard to truly understand fictional beings.
What wasn’t? Want to start with how he calls himself the president of “free speech” and then in the very next sentence says, but only in English?
March 5, 2025 at 8:16 PM
What wasn’t? Want to start with how he calls himself the president of “free speech” and then in the very next sentence says, but only in English?
Spineless v. Brainless.
Idiocracy is upon us.
Idiocracy is upon us.
March 5, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Spineless v. Brainless.
Idiocracy is upon us.
Idiocracy is upon us.
Great, abolish it all, then.
March 5, 2025 at 8:13 PM
Great, abolish it all, then.
Main difference is that more people are paying attention more to DOGE than CFPB.
Other main difference is that DOGE is, at least theoretically, trying to undo the over-reach of other agencies like CFPB.
Other main difference is that DOGE is, at least theoretically, trying to undo the over-reach of other agencies like CFPB.
February 28, 2025 at 11:41 PM
Main difference is that more people are paying attention more to DOGE than CFPB.
Other main difference is that DOGE is, at least theoretically, trying to undo the over-reach of other agencies like CFPB.
Other main difference is that DOGE is, at least theoretically, trying to undo the over-reach of other agencies like CFPB.