Huge thank you and congrats to @domfarolino.com ❤️
I've helped / worked on / watched this through different standards bodies for more than 10 years now. ☠️
(I'm going to have a lot of work now to adapt RxJS to this 😅)
Huge thank you and congrats to @domfarolino.com ❤️
I've helped / worked on / watched this through different standards bodies for more than 10 years now. ☠️
(I'm going to have a lot of work now to adapt RxJS to this 😅)
Hitting "Y" adds the current SHA to the URL. This ensures your link doesn't break as the repository changes over time.
Hitting "Y" adds the current SHA to the URL. This ensures your link doesn't break as the repository changes over time.
JSX doesn't treat new lines in text the same way that the browser interprets them in HTML text content
It's just interesting, in HTML the outcomes below would be the same.
JSX doesn't treat new lines in text the same way that the browser interprets them in HTML text content
It's just interesting, in HTML the outcomes below would be the same.
I used a simple 3 color palette: Ultramarine blue, cadmium yellow light, and alizarin crimson.
I used a relatively thin medium for the lower layers: 2:1 turpenoid to safflower oil. Getting heavier with more raw paint as I worked up.
I used a simple 3 color palette: Ultramarine blue, cadmium yellow light, and alizarin crimson.
I used a relatively thin medium for the lower layers: 2:1 turpenoid to safflower oil. Getting heavier with more raw paint as I worked up.
The wash/underpainting is just burnt sienna and turpenoid.
The wash/underpainting is just burnt sienna and turpenoid.
Although there's a lot to improve, I've never been happier with a painting. I'm not really an "artist" anymore, but a hobbyist. So I'll take it
Although there's a lot to improve, I've never been happier with a painting. I'm not really an "artist" anymore, but a hobbyist. So I'll take it
🍻
🍻
🤣
🤣
`for..of` does iteration, so any Iterable will work.
Passing `Item[]` here would be a unnecessarily restrictive:
`for..of` does iteration, so any Iterable will work.
Passing `Item[]` here would be a unnecessarily restrictive:
(It seems like this is off a little)
(It seems like this is off a little)
What is everyone doing now? cc @mattpocock.com
What is everyone doing now? cc @mattpocock.com
It's supported in all modern browsers and in Node >19.
It's supported in all modern browsers and in Node >19.
🤪🫡🦆
Okay, I actually like the duck though...
🤪🫡🦆
Okay, I actually like the duck though...
I feel so included! 🥰
😂⚰️
I feel so included! 🥰
😂⚰️
Let's say that the expected version number updates 3 times in a row, but the actual only updates 1 time after all of that.
What's ACTUALLY rendered here only changed twice. Which is fine in isolation.
But the component has a lot of other hooks/logic to execute.
Let's say that the expected version number updates 3 times in a row, but the actual only updates 1 time after all of that.
What's ACTUALLY rendered here only changed twice. Which is fine in isolation.
But the component has a lot of other hooks/logic to execute.
Note that there's no RxJS here. That observable is yet another flavor of observable. This time from Facebook's Relay library.
Note that there's no RxJS here. That observable is yet another flavor of observable. This time from Facebook's Relay library.