Yes, cities should use surveillance cameras because they help to prevent crime and catch criminals, and rules can limit access to the footage to protect people’s privacy.
#UCWCOMM150
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

No, forcing phone companies to share source code and phone logs would invade people’s privacy and give the government too much control over personal information.
#UCWCOMM150
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

Yes, cities should allow high‑tech surveillance cameras because they can enhance public safety by helping police identify suspects and deter crime, and access to footage is tightly controlled (e.g., only via court order), making them a useful tool despite privacy concerns.
#UCWCOMM150

Should Windsor allow facial recognition technology with its public surveillance cameras, even if it could help crime-fighting?

Police should not use facial recognition on body cameras yet.It can invade people’s privacy and make mistakes that harm innocent people.

Police should not use facial recognition on body cameras yet.It can invade people’s privacy and make mistakes that harm innocent people.

Police should not use facial recognition on body cameras yet.It can invade people’s privacy and make mistakes that harm innocent people.

Should police use real-time AI facial recognition on body cameras despite privacy, bias, and civil liberties concerns?

No because U.S. companies were just selling their products and its not their headache in what whey they are using it

No, its their government decision how to use the product which is not U S problem weather they are using in right way or wrong

No because U.S. companies were just selling their products and its not their headache in what whey they are using it

Should U.S. technology companies be held responsible for how their products are used in foreign surveillance systems that enable human rights abuses?