Indiana8
Miami 8
Yale8
USC7
Washing6
Berkeley5
duke5
Georgia5
Harvard5
iowa5
kansas5
Penn State5
UNC5
UVA5
ASU4
Bingham4
Boston4
Boulder4
Buffalo4
Michigan 4
OSU4
Penn4
San Diego4
vanderbilt4
Albany3
UBC 3
Columbia 3
emory 3
missouri 3
Oregon 3
Purdue 3
queens 3
rutgers 3
Temple 3
Western Ontario3

Here is rank order listing of “best” programs in terms of which program produced the most faculty teaching/researching currently in clinical psych PhD programs and how many faculty these programs produced:
UCLA 19
Wisconsin14
Pitt12
Illinois 12
Minnesota 11
Florida State 10
stony brook 9
Texas 9

Average number of PhDs who are now teaching/researching who earned PhDs from these 35 schools = 3.2 (SD=3.2) with average year PhD conferred 2001. Rank Order Correlation between USNews list and my list of # trained = .61.

Ie, where did the current Profs at clinical psych programs earn their PhD? Which clinical psych schools did they attend and get their training?
I was curious, so I searched the top 30 US and 5 Canadian clinical psych PhD programs to see where faculty earned their PhD. Gives some insight of “best”

tis the season for PhD grad applications and faculty searches.

Ever wonder which are the “best” clinical psych PhD programs? Yes, there are many ways to answer this (cough, US News World Report reputation rankings). Another way is “who trains/teaches the researchers and teachers”?

The undergrad class I’m teaching on depression and mood disorders played the darth Vader empire theme from Star Wars when I walked in to give the last exam. I feel seen and understood 🤓😂

@kevinmking.bsky.social @joshuagrubbsphd.bsky.social what are suggested ways to assess vaping usage, kinda how smoking amount was measured before. Any help from addictions/ smoking peeps is requested for vaping assessment in adults. Thanks

What are your thoughts about imputation for “bio” data more commonly collected and used in behavioral sciences? Eg immune markers, cortisol or CRH, mri brain indices like volume, dti, etc. always impute because “data are data”? Don’t bc bio data are “real” objective? Other views? colleagues’ views?