Tokhi & Zimmermann argue that the far right in government does so because it cannot fully align its anti-migration agenda with the liberal mandates and purposes of most IOs.

Have a look at this very cool paper, it's open access!
#UN80 #Trump #EarmarkedFunding #FarRight

Tokhi & Zimmermann demonstrate that governments with far-right parties reduce earmarked funding contributions to IOs by almost 30%, yet they do not alter bilateral aid commitments.

@holgerniemann.bsky.social @luisaue.bsky.social @katharinakrause.bsky.social

▶️ @benchristian.bsky.social and Dirk Peters examine how trust and distrust define the post-Brexit relationship between the EU and the UK.

This not only sheds light on an under-researched dimension of the Brexit process. It also contributes to trust research, which has yet to fully acknowledge both the significance of signals of trustworthiness & leadership transitions in creating windows of opportunity for changes in trust dynamics.

Rishi Sunak’s government countered the signals sent by its predecessor. By demonstrating its integrity and benevolence, it succeeded in rebuilding trust and facilitated the conclusion of the ‘Windsor Framework’.

Our analysis shows that during Boris Johnson’s premiership, the EU lost trust in the UK government’s benevolence and integrity, mainly because the UK repeatedly failed to honour previous commitments.

Building on insights from trust research in International Relations, we argue that the former partners gauge whether the other side can be trusted based on two types of signals: signals of benevolence and of integrity.

In a nutshell, we argue that from a trust perspective, withdrawals from IOs are highly significant events. When states leave a common institution and their relationship with each other is deprived of previous institutional certainties, trust becomes both necessary & precarious.

Using the case of #Brexit, we examine how trust was lost and later rebuilt during the exit negotiations between the #UK and the #EU