@oregonstate.edu has responded to my request for comment sent to Scott Barnes. #GoBeavs
Story updated with their full statement ☝️
@oregonstate.edu has responded to my request for comment sent to Scott Barnes. #GoBeavs
Story updated with their full statement ☝️
There is *no minimum* guarantee. This isn’t that difficult.
The guarantee is that they won’t tax that first $750k should they generate it.
But then they tax it later anyways. That’s all just creative accounting but in the end math is math.
There is *no minimum* guarantee. This isn’t that difficult.
The guarantee is that they won’t tax that first $750k should they generate it.
But then they tax it later anyways. That’s all just creative accounting but in the end math is math.
It’s bc talking about the deal, in detail and without spin, would lead to more questions than answers.
And the AD knows if they have to answer those questions, it would reveal things are far worse than they’re letting on.
It’s bc talking about the deal, in detail and without spin, would lead to more questions than answers.
And the AD knows if they have to answer those questions, it would reveal things are far worse than they’re letting on.
($750k (0%) + $100k (75%))
At $950k, it’s $150k (15.8%)
$1.05m, $225k (21.4%)
$1.15m, $300k (26.1%)
Now add in the management fee, and we pay BP $584k to return return $1.15m. Net, that’s $566k for OSU (49.2%)
($750k (0%) + $100k (75%))
At $950k, it’s $150k (15.8%)
$1.05m, $225k (21.4%)
$1.15m, $300k (26.1%)
Now add in the management fee, and we pay BP $584k to return return $1.15m. Net, that’s $566k for OSU (49.2%)
Puts us -$284k in the hole.
That hole counts towards the $750k they “promise” to generate. And that $750k is *not* guaranteed.
It’s untaxed, temporarily, until we eclipse the $750k threshold.
Puts us -$284k in the hole.
That hole counts towards the $750k they “promise” to generate. And that $750k is *not* guaranteed.
It’s untaxed, temporarily, until we eclipse the $750k threshold.
We’re not going to do that, per Barnes.
So why *pay* a company to “help” get more when we should just focus on filling up the tax-deductible rev-share pool, at no additional cost?
That is what doesn’t make sense.
We’re not going to do that, per Barnes.
So why *pay* a company to “help” get more when we should just focus on filling up the tax-deductible rev-share pool, at no additional cost?
That is what doesn’t make sense.
It’s a bad deal.
And it was signed by someone that’s either an idiot, a crook, or both.
It’s a bad deal.
And it was signed by someone that’s either an idiot, a crook, or both.