BelCamryn
@belcamryn.bsky.social
Socialist, Union, GOO Warlock, Typo Lord
lol, I can tell by that fucking text that's not from you researching., That's just you copying and pasting the AI result.
November 8, 2025 at 1:53 AM
lol, I can tell by that fucking text that's not from you researching., That's just you copying and pasting the AI result.
People say they're making 'Perfect the enemy of good' I would say in order to have perfect policy, you actually have to propose an alternative.
The Greens all the time practically say to Labor "DO ALL THE WORK!"
The Greens all the time practically say to Labor "DO ALL THE WORK!"
November 7, 2025 at 5:05 AM
People say they're making 'Perfect the enemy of good' I would say in order to have perfect policy, you actually have to propose an alternative.
The Greens all the time practically say to Labor "DO ALL THE WORK!"
The Greens all the time practically say to Labor "DO ALL THE WORK!"
You can only claim to be offering perfection, if you actually had an alternative policy.
November 7, 2025 at 5:04 AM
You can only claim to be offering perfection, if you actually had an alternative policy.
You guys don't even hide the fact you're practically a Greens think-tank
November 7, 2025 at 5:03 AM
You guys don't even hide the fact you're practically a Greens think-tank
Brown coal is less efficient than black thermal coal. There is a reason I used Victoria as my example and I said 'back in the day' because this was like when they were first rolling out and were highly inefficient. So both of those together made a worse impact on the climate. Times have changed
November 7, 2025 at 5:02 AM
Brown coal is less efficient than black thermal coal. There is a reason I used Victoria as my example and I said 'back in the day' because this was like when they were first rolling out and were highly inefficient. So both of those together made a worse impact on the climate. Times have changed
Did you not, listen to what I said? I said how Green steel is depends on the power supplying it. Not that the technology itself isn't Green!
At the moment if we were to make green steel, it would still be using mostly thermal coal for energy! I never said you made anything up.
At the moment if we were to make green steel, it would still be using mostly thermal coal for energy! I never said you made anything up.
November 7, 2025 at 5:00 AM
Did you not, listen to what I said? I said how Green steel is depends on the power supplying it. Not that the technology itself isn't Green!
At the moment if we were to make green steel, it would still be using mostly thermal coal for energy! I never said you made anything up.
At the moment if we were to make green steel, it would still be using mostly thermal coal for energy! I never said you made anything up.
Far as I'm aware the thermal coal plants were smaller expansions, but i'll look into that further.
Not going to take the word of somebody who accuses me of making up shit, then makes an outright wrong statement at the end.
Not going to take the word of somebody who accuses me of making up shit, then makes an outright wrong statement at the end.
November 7, 2025 at 3:30 AM
Far as I'm aware the thermal coal plants were smaller expansions, but i'll look into that further.
Not going to take the word of somebody who accuses me of making up shit, then makes an outright wrong statement at the end.
Not going to take the word of somebody who accuses me of making up shit, then makes an outright wrong statement at the end.
Back in the day, if you drove an EV car in Victoria it was actually work for CO2 emissions because even though the car was giving out nothing, to charge the car you were powering it with brown coal.
Green Steel is the same, it's only as clean as the energy it's using.
Green Steel is the same, it's only as clean as the energy it's using.
November 7, 2025 at 3:27 AM
Back in the day, if you drove an EV car in Victoria it was actually work for CO2 emissions because even though the car was giving out nothing, to charge the car you were powering it with brown coal.
Green Steel is the same, it's only as clean as the energy it's using.
Green Steel is the same, it's only as clean as the energy it's using.
These towns already run on gas, it's just the gas prices are so high that it's blowing out power costs. So cheap gas just gets used in existing infrastructure.
You do that while waiting for the renewable rollout
You do that while waiting for the renewable rollout
November 7, 2025 at 3:26 AM
These towns already run on gas, it's just the gas prices are so high that it's blowing out power costs. So cheap gas just gets used in existing infrastructure.
You do that while waiting for the renewable rollout
You do that while waiting for the renewable rollout
She is a nutter, but she believed the scam. Nobody around Trump cared about grocery prices or anything like that but she did.
So when she saw what it was really like, her batshit insanity actually made her come to the right conclusion.
On the right side, for the wrong reasons
So when she saw what it was really like, her batshit insanity actually made her come to the right conclusion.
On the right side, for the wrong reasons
November 7, 2025 at 3:20 AM
She is a nutter, but she believed the scam. Nobody around Trump cared about grocery prices or anything like that but she did.
So when she saw what it was really like, her batshit insanity actually made her come to the right conclusion.
On the right side, for the wrong reasons
So when she saw what it was really like, her batshit insanity actually made her come to the right conclusion.
On the right side, for the wrong reasons
It's that weird moment, that you believing legitimately in the insanity... makes you able to see your movement for the farce it is.
I'll be honest, she's being way to ideologically consistent than most Republicans.
I'll be honest, she's being way to ideologically consistent than most Republicans.
November 7, 2025 at 3:19 AM
It's that weird moment, that you believing legitimately in the insanity... makes you able to see your movement for the farce it is.
I'll be honest, she's being way to ideologically consistent than most Republicans.
I'll be honest, she's being way to ideologically consistent than most Republicans.
We are rolling out renewable energy but that takes time, especially because in those regional communities the costs of construction explodes.
You can't just flick a switch and magically create a windfarm. You can't demand people suffer in the meantime.
You can't just flick a switch and magically create a windfarm. You can't demand people suffer in the meantime.
November 7, 2025 at 3:16 AM
We are rolling out renewable energy but that takes time, especially because in those regional communities the costs of construction explodes.
You can't just flick a switch and magically create a windfarm. You can't demand people suffer in the meantime.
You can't just flick a switch and magically create a windfarm. You can't demand people suffer in the meantime.
Dude, we're a Federation of different states with different needs and those needs can clash.
Your single pet issue, that you singular care about doesn't override every bodies needs. That's not how a Democracy works. West Australians are citizens also, they need to be considered.
Your single pet issue, that you singular care about doesn't override every bodies needs. That's not how a Democracy works. West Australians are citizens also, they need to be considered.
November 7, 2025 at 3:09 AM
Dude, we're a Federation of different states with different needs and those needs can clash.
Your single pet issue, that you singular care about doesn't override every bodies needs. That's not how a Democracy works. West Australians are citizens also, they need to be considered.
Your single pet issue, that you singular care about doesn't override every bodies needs. That's not how a Democracy works. West Australians are citizens also, they need to be considered.
That was two reasons. 1: WA requested help with the energy crisis in regional WA and thus made a deal with woodside to extract more gas in exchange of selling cheaper gas to these regions. 2: Political, Woodside dominates WA politics
November 7, 2025 at 2:39 AM
That was two reasons. 1: WA requested help with the energy crisis in regional WA and thus made a deal with woodside to extract more gas in exchange of selling cheaper gas to these regions. 2: Political, Woodside dominates WA politics
Yeah, we can't change contracts we entered into back under Howard. We work with what we have.
November 7, 2025 at 2:38 AM
Yeah, we can't change contracts we entered into back under Howard. We work with what we have.
Coking coal mines, which is required for steel production which is required for the renewable rollout. Green Steel at this point of time is actually worse until we increase renewables in the grid.
November 7, 2025 at 2:21 AM
Coking coal mines, which is required for steel production which is required for the renewable rollout. Green Steel at this point of time is actually worse until we increase renewables in the grid.
Future made in Australia ultimately would offset any emissions made in scope 3. If it's allowed to go ahead.
Due to our unique access to critical minerals, we're one of the few countries that can go into manufacturing renewable energy.
Due to our unique access to critical minerals, we're one of the few countries that can go into manufacturing renewable energy.
November 7, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Future made in Australia ultimately would offset any emissions made in scope 3. If it's allowed to go ahead.
Due to our unique access to critical minerals, we're one of the few countries that can go into manufacturing renewable energy.
Due to our unique access to critical minerals, we're one of the few countries that can go into manufacturing renewable energy.
Woodside gas extension is to resolve another problem, regional WA is going through an even worse energy crisis than the rest of the country so in exchange for approve the expanion, Woodside is going to supply these communities with cheap Gas.
It's to make WA happy.
It's to make WA happy.
November 7, 2025 at 2:18 AM
Woodside gas extension is to resolve another problem, regional WA is going through an even worse energy crisis than the rest of the country so in exchange for approve the expanion, Woodside is going to supply these communities with cheap Gas.
It's to make WA happy.
It's to make WA happy.
They'll be forced to pay large fines into a climate offset fund, which can be used to HUGE offset environment programs. The current legislation drastically raises how much a company can be fined for not meeting it's plan.
November 7, 2025 at 2:17 AM
They'll be forced to pay large fines into a climate offset fund, which can be used to HUGE offset environment programs. The current legislation drastically raises how much a company can be fined for not meeting it's plan.
At this point of time, fossil fuel projects can't be rejected purely on environment or climate grounds. They have set criteria they have to meet and if they meet it, the minister can't legally reject them.
The EPA gives the ministers those powers.
The EPA gives the ministers those powers.
November 7, 2025 at 2:15 AM
At this point of time, fossil fuel projects can't be rejected purely on environment or climate grounds. They have set criteria they have to meet and if they meet it, the minister can't legally reject them.
The EPA gives the ministers those powers.
The EPA gives the ministers those powers.
Because you bots keep repeating the same shit again and again. It's just easier.
We're breaking records in renewable rollout, these law changes and the compromises in then are to allow the minister to make that even faster.
We're breaking records in renewable rollout, these law changes and the compromises in then are to allow the minister to make that even faster.
October 27, 2025 at 10:44 AM
Because you bots keep repeating the same shit again and again. It's just easier.
We're breaking records in renewable rollout, these law changes and the compromises in then are to allow the minister to make that even faster.
We're breaking records in renewable rollout, these law changes and the compromises in then are to allow the minister to make that even faster.
You know how many fossil fuel projects Labor has had to approve because the Environment Minister had no way of declining them? This legislation finally gives the minister power to reject a project simply based on "it's climate/environment impact" The Greens should want this!
October 27, 2025 at 9:39 AM
You know how many fossil fuel projects Labor has had to approve because the Environment Minister had no way of declining them? This legislation finally gives the minister power to reject a project simply based on "it's climate/environment impact" The Greens should want this!