the beem
@beeemmmooo.bsky.social
it me from the dead bird app (@beeemmmooo2)
feel free to dm to remind who you are
feel free to dm to remind who you are
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/2... from what I can tell it should be the responsibility of the Crown Court.
N.B. "Care should be taken not to apply those parts of s.22 to CTLs: namely s.22(4), s.22(6), and s.22(6A) and references to directions under 6A."
From www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-...
N.B. "Care should be taken not to apply those parts of s.22 to CTLs: namely s.22(4), s.22(6), and s.22(6A) and references to directions under 6A."
From www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-...
www.legislation.gov.uk
December 22, 2025 at 10:21 AM
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/2... from what I can tell it should be the responsibility of the Crown Court.
N.B. "Care should be taken not to apply those parts of s.22 to CTLs: namely s.22(4), s.22(6), and s.22(6A) and references to directions under 6A."
From www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-...
N.B. "Care should be taken not to apply those parts of s.22 to CTLs: namely s.22(4), s.22(6), and s.22(6A) and references to directions under 6A."
From www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-...
Reposted by the beem
3/ “For example, it is envisaged that the provision would allow a
suitably qualified male to female transsexual to be able to take up employment in a single sex women's hospital. They could themselves be treated as a comparator by a male applicant.”
This shows, quite bluntly, the EHRC is wrong.
suitably qualified male to female transsexual to be able to take up employment in a single sex women's hospital. They could themselves be treated as a comparator by a male applicant.”
This shows, quite bluntly, the EHRC is wrong.
November 21, 2025 at 5:16 PM
3/ “For example, it is envisaged that the provision would allow a
suitably qualified male to female transsexual to be able to take up employment in a single sex women's hospital. They could themselves be treated as a comparator by a male applicant.”
This shows, quite bluntly, the EHRC is wrong.
suitably qualified male to female transsexual to be able to take up employment in a single sex women's hospital. They could themselves be treated as a comparator by a male applicant.”
This shows, quite bluntly, the EHRC is wrong.
Reposted by the beem
2/ The instructions are just… fascinating? Well, every piece of public record I’ve uncovered on this subject so far has been fascinating, but this paragraph is exceptional.
It contradicts the Supreme Court directly, comprehensively, and unequivocally.
It contradicts the Supreme Court directly, comprehensively, and unequivocally.
November 21, 2025 at 5:07 PM
2/ The instructions are just… fascinating? Well, every piece of public record I’ve uncovered on this subject so far has been fascinating, but this paragraph is exceptional.
It contradicts the Supreme Court directly, comprehensively, and unequivocally.
It contradicts the Supreme Court directly, comprehensively, and unequivocally.
Reposted by the beem
mr mamdani will you recognise the people's demand to replace the nypd with whatever is going on here.
November 5, 2025 at 7:24 PM
mr mamdani will you recognise the people's demand to replace the nypd with whatever is going on here.