Art should be a tool for individual creative freedom and social change. These norms can limit the ways in which artists express themselves, hindering artistic development. Restricting art makes it harder for innovative and original ideas to emerge.

When art is considered a profession, the perception arises that those practicing it should possess a 'certificate' or diploma. However, such an approach restricts the artist's freedom of expression.

Determining the depth of artistic expression based solely on the resulting aesthetics makes the use of data, the core meaning of the piece, meaningless.

When data is altered for artistic purposes, it can distort the depth of meaning the art is meant to convey.

This approach can blur the line between the 'meaning' inherent in data and the freedom of abstraction in art.

I see an infinite and interconnected series of interlocking systems that exist in the meantime.

Computers, extensions of humans, find their own extension in artificial intelligence. As evolution in nature, computers, which are an extension of human beings, find their own extension in artificial intelligence.

Visualization stands as the conduit through which the intricacies of systems reveal themselves, shedding light upon their inner workings. It is not the stroke of an artist's brush, but rather the language of clarity and comprehension.

Therefore, visualization is necessary to make the complexity of systems understandable, but this process should generally not be considered as art; rather, it should be regarded as a means of communication.