As a follow up, I've found Cox v. Turkey [2010] App. no. 2933/03 to be fairly on point. hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-956

An interesting study, but the 404 article doesn't do a good job of differentiating between the literature review and the actual findings of this study. They attribute some of the findings in earlier literature related to automation to findings from the study reported in the study. It's sloppy.

Thanks! I'll take a look.

And... I know this isn't really what you asked for, but I really like this newer piece on theory in research (which speaks to methods of how to integrate, use, and think about theory in the research process): academic.oup.com/hcr/article/...

This is a new one I plan to use next term, as it looks quite interesting: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... (also from some of your colleagues at ASU!)

Perhaps a bit too surveillance/criminology focused for what you are looking for (?), but I find this one quite interesting and useful for provoking discussion: link.springer.com/article/10.1...

If anything, Issue #4 was my favourite of 2024, not least because of the special dialogue section on #syntheticdata, edited by @bcnewell.bsky.social, but also because the first article is titled "Squeeveillance" and deals with #surveillance and cuteness.

ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/su...

The new Dialogue on Synthetic Data/Media and Surveillance in Surveillance & Society @survstudiesnet.bsky.social includes 5 stellar pieces from @susser.bsky.social & Jeremy Seeman, Louis Ravn, Renée Ridgway & Nicolas Malevé, Tanja Wiehn, and Andrew Fitzgerald. ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/su...