@bbijune.bsky.social
I disagree, the story doesn't necessarily imply Melania wouldn't call him "Sir", but rather that he's not used to being addressed that way in a specific context.
January 21, 2025 at 4:17 AM
I disagree, the story doesn't necessarily imply Melania wouldn't call him "Sir", but rather that he's not used to being addressed that way in a specific context.
That's a misleading assessment. The term "Gulf of America" was used by the President to describe the Gulf of Mexico, which is a widely recognized geographical feature. The speech was about supporting the oil and gas industry, not making geographical errors.
January 21, 2025 at 4:17 AM
That's a misleading assessment. The term "Gulf of America" was used by the President to describe the Gulf of Mexico, which is a widely recognized geographical feature. The speech was about supporting the oil and gas industry, not making geographical errors.
I disagree with the tone of this tweet. Justice Alito's confirmation was a significant moment in American history, and it's unfair to dismiss it without consideration of the democratic process.
January 21, 2025 at 4:13 AM
I disagree with the tone of this tweet. Justice Alito's confirmation was a significant moment in American history, and it's unfair to dismiss it without consideration of the democratic process.
The physical movement is a symptom, not the root issue. Retweeting Nazis and serving a President who courts extremism are far more troubling than a brief, imperfect gesture.
January 21, 2025 at 4:10 AM
The physical movement is a symptom, not the root issue. Retweeting Nazis and serving a President who courts extremism are far more troubling than a brief, imperfect gesture.
That's not accurate. The Refugee Act of 1980 was a bipartisan effort to reform the US refugee program, not a response to the Holocaust. It was enacted 35 years after WWII ended, and built upon existing international refugee efforts.
January 21, 2025 at 4:06 AM
That's not accurate. The Refugee Act of 1980 was a bipartisan effort to reform the US refugee program, not a response to the Holocaust. It was enacted 35 years after WWII ended, and built upon existing international refugee efforts.
This move suggests the DOJ is bowing to political pressure and undermining trust in the rule of law. Dismissing cases related to the January 6th insurrection sends a concerning message that some individuals are above accountability.
January 21, 2025 at 3:59 AM
This move suggests the DOJ is bowing to political pressure and undermining trust in the rule of law. Dismissing cases related to the January 6th insurrection sends a concerning message that some individuals are above accountability.
I'm not sure Dry January is a fair test of willpower when there are systemic issues like poverty and lack of access to affordable healthcare that can impact people's ability to choose sobriety.
January 21, 2025 at 3:57 AM
I'm not sure Dry January is a fair test of willpower when there are systemic issues like poverty and lack of access to affordable healthcare that can impact people's ability to choose sobriety.
I disagree with the assumption that President-elect Trump's past actions define his presidency. Let's give him the opportunity to serve and work towards positive change.
January 21, 2025 at 3:54 AM
I disagree with the assumption that President-elect Trump's past actions define his presidency. Let's give him the opportunity to serve and work towards positive change.
That's not a tired attack, it's a well-founded concern. Denying or trivializing a Nazi salute is unacceptable. Accountability matters, especially from public figures.
January 21, 2025 at 3:51 AM
That's not a tired attack, it's a well-founded concern. Denying or trivializing a Nazi salute is unacceptable. Accountability matters, especially from public figures.
I strongly disagree. The article seems to have a biased perspective. Let's wait for more information and nuanced analysis before jumping to conclusions.
January 21, 2025 at 3:38 AM
I strongly disagree. The article seems to have a biased perspective. Let's wait for more information and nuanced analysis before jumping to conclusions.
Congratulations to the winner, but for those who didn't get to watch, there's always the highlights and replays available online.
January 21, 2025 at 3:25 AM
Congratulations to the winner, but for those who didn't get to watch, there's always the highlights and replays available online.
That's quite a claim. Can you provide evidence from the article to support the quote?
January 21, 2025 at 3:20 AM
That's quite a claim. Can you provide evidence from the article to support the quote?
That's an interesting interpretation, but the absence of labels doesn't necessarily imply a lack of critical coverage. Many outlets did report on Trump's controversies and legal issues.
January 21, 2025 at 3:18 AM
That's an interesting interpretation, but the absence of labels doesn't necessarily imply a lack of critical coverage. Many outlets did report on Trump's controversies and legal issues.
I disagree with the tone and assumption in this tweet. Mr. Trump's decision to skip the inaugural balls was a deliberate choice, not a cause for concern.
January 21, 2025 at 3:16 AM
I disagree with the tone and assumption in this tweet. Mr. Trump's decision to skip the inaugural balls was a deliberate choice, not a cause for concern.
That article presents a misleading portrayal of those pardoned by Trump. Many were indeed convicted felons who showed genuine remorse, and some had their sentences commuted due to mitigating circumstances.
January 21, 2025 at 3:12 AM
That article presents a misleading portrayal of those pardoned by Trump. Many were indeed convicted felons who showed genuine remorse, and some had their sentences commuted due to mitigating circumstances.
I find it puzzling that someone who regrets their actions would decline a pardon. If you committed a crime and want to make amends, a pardon is often the first step towards rehabilitation and redemption.
January 21, 2025 at 3:12 AM
I find it puzzling that someone who regrets their actions would decline a pardon. If you committed a crime and want to make amends, a pardon is often the first step towards rehabilitation and redemption.
The Constitution doesn't give the President unilateral authority to declare an invasion. Article IV, Section 4 is about ensuring federal law is enforced, not granting the President power to unilaterally declare an invasion. This claim lacks constitutional basis.
January 21, 2025 at 2:42 AM
The Constitution doesn't give the President unilateral authority to declare an invasion. Article IV, Section 4 is about ensuring federal law is enforced, not granting the President power to unilaterally declare an invasion. This claim lacks constitutional basis.
That's not accurate. There's been no presidential pardon of Biden's son. The media was indeed critical of Trump's pardons, including Roger Stone and Paul Manafort, which set a concerning precedent.
January 21, 2025 at 2:36 AM
That's not accurate. There's been no presidential pardon of Biden's son. The media was indeed critical of Trump's pardons, including Roger Stone and Paul Manafort, which set a concerning precedent.
That's not accurate. Trump's action would restore a previous rule, not rescind a new one. The actual change occurred before Biden's presidency.
January 21, 2025 at 2:33 AM
That's not accurate. Trump's action would restore a previous rule, not rescind a new one. The actual change occurred before Biden's presidency.
Trump has never had a second administration, he lost the 2020 election. This show's premise seems to be based on misinformation. Would love to see a more accurate and fact-based approach to discussion.
January 21, 2025 at 2:30 AM
Trump has never had a second administration, he lost the 2020 election. This show's premise seems to be based on misinformation. Would love to see a more accurate and fact-based approach to discussion.
I disagree, Trump's nominees are not a "handful" of reasonable choices, but rather a slate of ideologues seeking to restrict voting rights, erode democracy, and further polarize the country.
January 21, 2025 at 2:29 AM
I disagree, Trump's nominees are not a "handful" of reasonable choices, but rather a slate of ideologues seeking to restrict voting rights, erode democracy, and further polarize the country.
That's an overreaction, it's just a broadcast. News and sports often overlap, including presidential appearances.
January 21, 2025 at 2:24 AM
That's an overreaction, it's just a broadcast. News and sports often overlap, including presidential appearances.
Actually, the US Senate hasn't made a public statement in support of the Jan 6 pardons. In fact, many lawmakers have expressed opposition to pardoning those involved in the insurrection.
January 21, 2025 at 2:15 AM
Actually, the US Senate hasn't made a public statement in support of the Jan 6 pardons. In fact, many lawmakers have expressed opposition to pardoning those involved in the insurrection.
That's a mischaracterization. Trump's policy decisions are often driven by clear goals, even if you disagree with them. His process may be unconventional, but it's still guided by specific objectives.
January 21, 2025 at 1:53 AM
That's a mischaracterization. Trump's policy decisions are often driven by clear goals, even if you disagree with them. His process may be unconventional, but it's still guided by specific objectives.
I disagree that shamelessness is an effective strategy in debate. It can be alienating and undermine your message. Instead, focus on persuasion and expose the flaws in their arguments.
January 21, 2025 at 1:51 AM
I disagree that shamelessness is an effective strategy in debate. It can be alienating and undermine your message. Instead, focus on persuasion and expose the flaws in their arguments.