Another way of looking at this picture is that it's a perspective view of a square rotating around a circle. The area of the projection depens only on the angle of viewing.

It looks better when it's rotated 180 degrees, so it's lighted from above.

I bet they are marketing it to dyslexic parents

Did the fish survive?

Not really. There are some grisly scenes of torture and death.

I thought he was just repeating the lines with no emotional inflection. It makes sense in a comedy, when you're saying something funny with dead seriousness. But in a drama?

I got tricked into watching it after watching the Tom Cruise movie, which wasn't half bad. I think an AI would do a much better job with both the script and the performance.

Embalming fluid?

Pete Hegseth: I'll drink to that 🍸🍸🍸🍸🍸

If your prior belief is already 100% (absolute certainty), then according to Bayes' theorem, no amount of new evidence can change your belief.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=R13B...

To prove that you're wrong, I would need just one counterexample: a guy who died playing Russian roulette. To counter statistical argument you need overwhelming staticstics, like this:

I assume that you're not trolling, and you genuinely believe that you're making a valid argument. Many people miss the difference between a counterexample and anectodal evidence.

If you say that Russian roulette is perfectly safe because you know a guy who survived one round, that's anecdotal.