Richard Bartholomew
banner
bartholoviews.bsky.social
Richard Bartholomew
@bartholoviews.bsky.social
Dissident author of The Deep State in the Heart of Texas. Researcher/Analyst at The Center for Deep Political Research. Artist. Enemy of the (deep political) state.
Correction: That file was only referenced in a report from 2022. It is known to exist but has not yet appeared. open.substack.com/pub/jfkfacts/p…
https://open.substack.com/pub/jfkfacts/p…
March 26, 2025 at 2:40 AM
The only truly new smoking gun now would be the first and only one ever showing Oswald's guilt (which won't honestly happen).
March 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM
and John Newman's smoke was that, "In my view, whoever Oswald's direct handler or handlers were, we must now seriously consider the possibility that Angleton was probably their general manager."
March 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM
In 2008, there were more revelations. Jefferson Morley's smoke was that in February 1964, the Warren Commission's J. Lee Rankin asked the CIA for the cables about Oswald in Mexico City, and Angleton "ghosted" him;
March 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Jim Garrison prosecuted the CIA in the media and in court from 1967 to 1969. Then came the discovery in the 1970s of the illegal, decades-long, ultra-secret CIA assassination plots against world leaders—though forbidden by Kennedy.
March 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Fidel Castro gave an hours-long public speech the day after the assassination telling the world Oswald was known to the CIA. Castro wasn't guessing. His agents had long since infiltrated CIA plots against him.
March 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM
The evidence of conspiracy has been a thundering Mount Vesuvius from day one. By comparison, these files add pebbles to that mountain and candle smoke to that eruption.
March 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM
By November 1963, it was 180 pages based on close contact. The CIA's lie ever since is that they had no contact with Oswald.

A bit of perspective:
March 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM