bamage
@bamage.bsky.social
Dog-lover, borderline misanthrope. I still believe in the scientific method. New place, so I'll try to be "positive".
Never heard of her before but love her already.
December 5, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Never heard of her before but love her already.
Yah, f*ck that guy. Dems will lose again if they nominate him.
December 5, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Yah, f*ck that guy. Dems will lose again if they nominate him.
What's the over/under on the Extremes simply saying "Constitution, you say? Pfffft!"
December 5, 2025 at 7:10 PM
What's the over/under on the Extremes simply saying "Constitution, you say? Pfffft!"
I know that don't CARE, but do yo think they even KNOW how widely detested they are?
December 5, 2025 at 6:48 PM
I know that don't CARE, but do yo think they even KNOW how widely detested they are?
Tragedy + time = Comedy but... HOW MUCH F*CKING TIME DO WE HAVE!?
December 5, 2025 at 6:26 PM
Tragedy + time = Comedy but... HOW MUCH F*CKING TIME DO WE HAVE!?
Reposted by bamage
The Supreme Court majority has decided that they are the fact-finders, and the facts are what they want them to be, and quite frankly if District Courts disagree, they can pound sand because they're not the ones in charge.
They're right about the last part. But the damage they're doing is longterm.
They're right about the last part. But the damage they're doing is longterm.
December 4, 2025 at 11:09 PM
The Supreme Court majority has decided that they are the fact-finders, and the facts are what they want them to be, and quite frankly if District Courts disagree, they can pound sand because they're not the ones in charge.
They're right about the last part. But the damage they're doing is longterm.
They're right about the last part. But the damage they're doing is longterm.
Because of course they did.
December 4, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Because of course they did.
What sort of fucking idiot ARE you!?
December 4, 2025 at 10:29 PM
What sort of fucking idiot ARE you!?
I... have to ask. How was it?
December 4, 2025 at 5:11 PM
I... have to ask. How was it?
I was joking initially. You seem to take it (yourself?) way too seriously though. No offense intended. Have a good day.
December 3, 2025 at 11:55 PM
I was joking initially. You seem to take it (yourself?) way too seriously though. No offense intended. Have a good day.
maybe once in the Bible, otherwise, not so much
December 3, 2025 at 11:52 PM
maybe once in the Bible, otherwise, not so much
If by "all corporate CEOS" you mean EVERYBODY
December 3, 2025 at 11:41 PM
If by "all corporate CEOS" you mean EVERYBODY
name a word that follows "wreaked" that's NOT havoc!
December 3, 2025 at 11:40 PM
name a word that follows "wreaked" that's NOT havoc!
Reposted by bamage
Lesson 6: If you have a theory of the Supreme Court that does not include political ideology, its going to be wrong. During the Biden administration it was all major questions because they did not like his policies, and during Trump it is mostly unitary executive, because they do.
December 3, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Lesson 6: If you have a theory of the Supreme Court that does not include political ideology, its going to be wrong. During the Biden administration it was all major questions because they did not like his policies, and during Trump it is mostly unitary executive, because they do.