Bad Texas Golfer 🟧🇺🇸🇲🇽💙🌈🖖
LightNews LightNews
banner
bad-golfer.bsky.social
Bad Texas Golfer 🟧🇺🇸🇲🇽💙🌈🖖
@bad-golfer.bsky.social
4.3K followers 4.5K following 250 posts
Here to vent and support my friends. 🇺🇸🇺🇦💙🟧🇲🇽🖖
17 Handicap, but hoping to get better
Feeling Blue!
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Bad Texas Golfer 🟧🇺🇸🇲🇽💙🌈🖖
fatcat99.bsky.social
Since the IRS seems to know exactly how much we owe anyway, why don’t they just send us a bill and eliminate the need for filing?
December 1, 2025 at 8:01 PM
bad-golfer.bsky.social
Small price to pay
December 1, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Reposted by Bad Texas Golfer 🟧🇺🇸🇲🇽💙🌈🖖
stankvicious.bsky.social
Now we know it was the brain.
November 30, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Reposted by Bad Texas Golfer 🟧🇺🇸🇲🇽💙🌈🖖
kissphoria.bsky.social
idk not to mention how very nuanced and normal the actual response here was
Trans Professors comment Mel Curth (She/They) November 16, 2025 at 2:04 PM Please note that I am not deducting points because you have certain beliefs, but instead I am deducting point for you posting a reaction paper that does not answer the questions for this assignment, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence in a scientific class, and is at times offensive. While you are entitled to your own personal beliefs, there is an appropriate time or place to implement them in your reflections. I encourage all students to question or challenge the course material with other empirical findings or testable hypotheses, but using your own personal beliefs to argue against the findings of not only this article, but the findings of countless articles across psychology, biology, sociology, etc. is not best practice. You argue that abiding by normative gender roles is beneficial (it is perfectly fine to believe this. but to then say that evervone should act TPUSA OU Trans Professors comment the same, while also saying that people aren't pressured into gendered expectations is contradictory, especially since your arguments reflect a religious pressure to act in gender-stereotypical ways. You can say that strict gender norms don't create gender stereotypes, but that isn't true by definition of what a stereotype is. Please note that acknowledging gender stereotypes does not immediately denote a negative connotation, a nuance this article discusses. Additionally, to call an entire group of people "demonic" is highly offensive, especially a minoritized population. You are entitled to your own beliefs, but this isn't a vague narrative of "society pushes lies," but instead the result of countless years developing psychological and scientific evidence for these claims and directly interacting with the communities involved. You may personally disagree with this, but that TPUSA OU 2 Trans Professors comment doesn't change the fact that every major psychological, medical, pediatric, and psychiatric association in the United States acknowledges that, biologically and psychologically, sex and gender is neither binary nor fixed. I implore you apply some more perspective and empathy in your work. If you personally disagree with the findings, then by all means share your criticisms, but make sure to do so in a way that is appropriate and using the methodology of empirical psychology, as aligned with the learning goals in this class. If you have any additional questions or concerns about this or would like some additional educational resources, I would be happy to discuss this further and provide you with them. 3 TPUSA OU Additional professor Megan Waldron (She/Her/Hers) November 16, 2025 at 3:09 PM Samantha, I am the other instructor for this course, and I have also taken the time to read your paper. I concur with Mel on the grade you received. This paper should not be considered as a completion of the assignment. Everyone has different ways in which they see the world, but in an academic course such as this you are being asked to support your ideas with empirical evidence and higher-level reasoning. I find it concerning that you state at the beginning of your paper that you do not think bullying ("teasing") is a bad thing. In addition, your paper directly and harshly criticizes your peers and their opinions, which are just as valuable as yours. Disagreeing with others is fine, but there is a respectful way to go about it. That goes for discussion posts as well as reaction papers. Please employ more thoughtfulness in your future assignments TPUSA OU
November 29, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Reposted by Bad Texas Golfer 🟧🇺🇸🇲🇽💙🌈🖖
sanho.bsky.social
Here’s the full transcript of Witkoff’s traitorous call with the top Russian negotiator. Witkoff is basically an unregistered foreign agent working for Putin.
bloomberg.com War in Ukraine: Witkoff's Advice to Russia | US-Russia Plan Hybrid Warfare US Sanctions Frozen Rus:< Steve Witkoff: Hi Yuri. Yuri Ushakov: Yeah Steve hi, how are you? SW: Good Yuri. How you doing? YU: 1 am ok. Congratulations my friend. SW: Thank you. YU: You made a great job. Just a great job. Thank you so much. Thank you, thank you. SW: Thank you Yuri and thanks for your support. I know your country supported it and I thank you. YU: Yes, yes, yes. Yes. You know that's why we suspend the organization of first Russian-Arabic summit. SW: Yes. YU: Yeah, because we think that you are making the real job there in the region. SW: Well listen. I am going to tell you something. I think, I think if we can get the Russia-Ukraine thing solved, everybody'll be jumping for joy. YU: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, you need to solve only one problem. (laughs] SW: What? YU: Russian-Ukrainian war. SW: 1 know! How do we get that solved? bloomberg.com War in Ukraine: Witkoff's Advice to Russia US-Russia Plan Hybrid Warfare US Sanctions Frozen Rust YU: Russian-Ukrainian war. SW: I know! How do we get that solved? YU: My friend, I just want your advice. Do you think that it will be useful if our bosses will talk on the phone? SW: Yes, I do. YU: You do. And when you think it could be possible? SW: I think as soon as you suggest, my guy is ready to do it. YU: Ok, ok. SW: Yuri, Yuri, here's what I would do. My recommendation. YU: Yes, please. SW: I would make the call and just reiterate that you congratulate the president on this achievement, that you supported it, you supported it, that you respect that he is a man of peace and you're just, you're really glad to have seen it happen. So I would say that. I think from that it's going to be a really good call. Because - let me tell you what I told the President. I told the president that you - that the Russian Federation has always wanted a peace deal. That's my belief. I told the president I believe that. And I believe the question is - the issue is is that we have two nations that are having a hard time coming to a compromise and when we do, we're going to have a peace deal. I'm even thinking that maybe we set out like a 20-point peace proposal, just like we did in Gaza. We put a 20-point Trump plan together that was 20 points for peace and I'm thinking maybe we do the same thing with you. My point is this... bloomberg.com War in Ukraine: Witkoff's Advice to Russia US-Russia Plan Hybrid Warfare US Sanctions Frozen Russ YU: Ok, ok my friend. I think that very point our leaders could discuss. Hey Steve, I agree with you that he will congratulate, he will say that Mr. Trump is a real peace man and so and so. That he will say. SW: But here's what I think would be amazing. YU: Ok, ok. SW: What if, what if... hear me out…. YU: I will discuss that with my boss and then I come back to you. Ok? SW: Yeah because listen to what I'm saying. I just want you to say, maybe just to say this to President Putin, because you know I have the deepest respect for President Putin. YU: Yes, Yes. SW: Maybe he says to President Trump: you know, Steve and Yuri discussed a very similar 20-point plan to peace and that could be something that we think might move the needle a little bit, we're open to those sorts of things - to explore what it's going to take to get a peace deal done. Now, me to you, I know what it's going to take to get a peace deal done: Donetsk and maybe a land swap somewhere. But I'm saying instead of talking like that, let's talk more hopefully because I think we're going to get to a deal here. And I think Yuri, the president will give me a lot of space and discretion to get to the deal. YU: I see... SW: ...so if we can create that opportunity that after this I talked to Yuri and we had a conversation I think that could lead to big stuff. bloomberg.com War in Ukraine: Witkoff's Advice to Russia US-Russia Plan Hybrid Warfare US Sanctions Frozen Russ YU: Ok, that sounds good. Sounds good. SW: And here's one more thing: Zelenskiy is coming to the White House on Friday. YU: I know that. [chuckles] SW: I will go to that meeting because they want me there, but I think if possible we have the call with your boss before that Friday meeting. YU: Before, before - yeah? SW: Correct. YU: Ok, ok. I got your advice. So I discuss that with my boss and then I come back to you, ok? SW: Ok Yuri, I'll speak to you soon. YU: Great, great. Thank you so much. Thanks you. SW: Bye, bye. YU: Bye. [Call Ends]
November 26, 2025 at 1:43 PM