bac-one
@bac-one.bsky.social
he/him. itinerant porter. can only chew on one side of my mouth.
It means he doesn't get to show off his fantastic ass.
November 13, 2025 at 4:53 PM
It means he doesn't get to show off his fantastic ass.
he totally wasn't involved. He also didn't take numerous flights with epstein. Ya know what, trump probably wasn't involved either.
November 13, 2025 at 3:52 PM
he totally wasn't involved. He also didn't take numerous flights with epstein. Ya know what, trump probably wasn't involved either.
I'm not sure But I believe this is from "The Ends of the World: Volcanic Apocalypses, Lethal Oceans, and Our Quest to Understand Earth's Past Mass Extinctions" By Peter Brannen
I think this is so good it's something I have read to multiple people for no reason other than I think it's amazing.
I think this is so good it's something I have read to multiple people for no reason other than I think it's amazing.
November 4, 2025 at 4:28 PM
I'm not sure But I believe this is from "The Ends of the World: Volcanic Apocalypses, Lethal Oceans, and Our Quest to Understand Earth's Past Mass Extinctions" By Peter Brannen
I think this is so good it's something I have read to multiple people for no reason other than I think it's amazing.
I think this is so good it's something I have read to multiple people for no reason other than I think it's amazing.
I Think You're almost there.
October 26, 2025 at 5:21 AM
I Think You're almost there.
Discussion of what would drive a player to risk millions to make thousands & if that's addiction is valid.
Having it while pregame (ect) shows are SATURATED w/sportsbook advertising in the form of discussing bets & commentators making picks?
Doing that while having the discussion?
Is Despicable.
Having it while pregame (ect) shows are SATURATED w/sportsbook advertising in the form of discussing bets & commentators making picks?
Doing that while having the discussion?
Is Despicable.
October 25, 2025 at 12:26 AM
Discussion of what would drive a player to risk millions to make thousands & if that's addiction is valid.
Having it while pregame (ect) shows are SATURATED w/sportsbook advertising in the form of discussing bets & commentators making picks?
Doing that while having the discussion?
Is Despicable.
Having it while pregame (ect) shows are SATURATED w/sportsbook advertising in the form of discussing bets & commentators making picks?
Doing that while having the discussion?
Is Despicable.
That's what I've been trying to figure out.
This CNN ticker? Has provided the most information I've found. But no answer to your specific question.
edition.cnn.com/sport/live-n...
This part ("They") makes it seem like the sports betting aspect was organized.
but yeah, no answer.
This CNN ticker? Has provided the most information I've found. But no answer to your specific question.
edition.cnn.com/sport/live-n...
This part ("They") makes it seem like the sports betting aspect was organized.
but yeah, no answer.
October 23, 2025 at 4:11 PM
That's what I've been trying to figure out.
This CNN ticker? Has provided the most information I've found. But no answer to your specific question.
edition.cnn.com/sport/live-n...
This part ("They") makes it seem like the sports betting aspect was organized.
but yeah, no answer.
This CNN ticker? Has provided the most information I've found. But no answer to your specific question.
edition.cnn.com/sport/live-n...
This part ("They") makes it seem like the sports betting aspect was organized.
but yeah, no answer.
October 21, 2025 at 11:37 PM
We already knew it but daaaamn is bluesky shit at this.
October 18, 2025 at 2:46 PM
We already knew it but daaaamn is bluesky shit at this.
Holy Shit. I always thought we were 1st but america is only 5th in the illustrious per capita prison population.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
October 13, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Holy Shit. I always thought we were 1st but america is only 5th in the illustrious per capita prison population.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
The guardian is pushing this crap.
October 1, 2025 at 5:18 PM
The guardian is pushing this crap.
No such thing as bad publicity.
October 1, 2025 at 5:18 PM
No such thing as bad publicity.
Felt some of your other articles about the repercussions faced by announcers commenting on kirk missed some of the nuance regarding the type of "debate" kirk was actually in favor of.
Whatever the case this was a very astute paragraph.
Whatever the case this was a very astute paragraph.
September 24, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Felt some of your other articles about the repercussions faced by announcers commenting on kirk missed some of the nuance regarding the type of "debate" kirk was actually in favor of.
Whatever the case this was a very astute paragraph.
Whatever the case this was a very astute paragraph.
If such an interview exists shuster is the only person who knows about it because nobody else has reported such a thing.
There is this interview which shuster could have heavily editorialized and misquoted though.
There is this interview which shuster could have heavily editorialized and misquoted though.
September 12, 2025 at 11:09 PM
If such an interview exists shuster is the only person who knows about it because nobody else has reported such a thing.
There is this interview which shuster could have heavily editorialized and misquoted though.
There is this interview which shuster could have heavily editorialized and misquoted though.
Incredible enough to misquote this? (Taken from an npr article but I know the wsj reported the same conversation)
If you know of any further reporting on the shooters viewpoint, hell yes please link. But this is the only one I know of. And if it is then shuster is all but boldface lying about it.
If you know of any further reporting on the shooters viewpoint, hell yes please link. But this is the only one I know of. And if it is then shuster is all but boldface lying about it.
September 12, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Incredible enough to misquote this? (Taken from an npr article but I know the wsj reported the same conversation)
If you know of any further reporting on the shooters viewpoint, hell yes please link. But this is the only one I know of. And if it is then shuster is all but boldface lying about it.
If you know of any further reporting on the shooters viewpoint, hell yes please link. But this is the only one I know of. And if it is then shuster is all but boldface lying about it.
September 12, 2025 at 4:32 PM
In case you needed more of a reason to dislike the yankees.
September 11, 2025 at 1:14 PM
In case you needed more of a reason to dislike the yankees.
Olson had a near perfect response to this sideshow last year and him waiting to share these more personal feelings on it is a great example of professionalism.
September 9, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Olson had a near perfect response to this sideshow last year and him waiting to share these more personal feelings on it is a great example of professionalism.
Guess he gets this a lot.
August 25, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Guess he gets this a lot.
