b3l5ry
@b3l5ry.bsky.social
you need to read more Dr Seuss
September 13, 2025 at 1:05 AM
you need to read more Dr Seuss
you know that you can be mad at your friend who's acting like an asshole AND someone you hate for being an asshole at the same time, right?
September 12, 2025 at 6:59 PM
you know that you can be mad at your friend who's acting like an asshole AND someone you hate for being an asshole at the same time, right?
"liberals are mad about 'political violence' but won't stop actual violence"
you: "so you like political violence"
that's what you said and you're being smarmy instead of clarifying
you: "so you like political violence"
that's what you said and you're being smarmy instead of clarifying
September 12, 2025 at 6:58 PM
"liberals are mad about 'political violence' but won't stop actual violence"
you: "so you like political violence"
that's what you said and you're being smarmy instead of clarifying
you: "so you like political violence"
that's what you said and you're being smarmy instead of clarifying
oh for sure! i was using 'dragon' in the western colloquial sense, as a standin for 'villain' as generally used.
dragons themselves aren't inherently evil and you can tell a lot about an artist by how they portray them.
the dragon in 'shrek' eating a tyrant is a pretty good dragon.
dragons themselves aren't inherently evil and you can tell a lot about an artist by how they portray them.
the dragon in 'shrek' eating a tyrant is a pretty good dragon.
September 11, 2025 at 9:22 PM
oh for sure! i was using 'dragon' in the western colloquial sense, as a standin for 'villain' as generally used.
dragons themselves aren't inherently evil and you can tell a lot about an artist by how they portray them.
the dragon in 'shrek' eating a tyrant is a pretty good dragon.
dragons themselves aren't inherently evil and you can tell a lot about an artist by how they portray them.
the dragon in 'shrek' eating a tyrant is a pretty good dragon.
people are so weird. they want fiction of tyrants being beheaded and parades following, but the moment someone goes 'woo' irl it's a big problem.
September 11, 2025 at 9:07 PM
people are so weird. they want fiction of tyrants being beheaded and parades following, but the moment someone goes 'woo' irl it's a big problem.
brb writing more fiction where dragons and tyrants get beheaded and then there's a parade after
September 11, 2025 at 8:55 PM
brb writing more fiction where dragons and tyrants get beheaded and then there's a parade after
probably cuz it's not a flex
September 11, 2025 at 8:53 PM
probably cuz it's not a flex
the mirror is in your bathroom. i am not your bathroom.
September 11, 2025 at 8:43 PM
the mirror is in your bathroom. i am not your bathroom.
you shouldn't have to hold your tongue, either. by that i mean, there are people who don't want to hear it saying 'wrong' things, and people who don't want to hear it at all, so as long as you're using it you're sticking it to the latter.
September 11, 2025 at 7:18 PM
you shouldn't have to hold your tongue, either. by that i mean, there are people who don't want to hear it saying 'wrong' things, and people who don't want to hear it at all, so as long as you're using it you're sticking it to the latter.
weird, because it specifies 'bad' people. you into non sequiturs?
September 11, 2025 at 7:15 PM
weird, because it specifies 'bad' people. you into non sequiturs?
np. i figured you and op were saying the same thing, there was just a sar-chasm in the way lol
September 11, 2025 at 7:11 PM
np. i figured you and op were saying the same thing, there was just a sar-chasm in the way lol
okay.
op wasn't saying those lives were equal to charlie kirk, implying the opposite. the jab was at hypocrites who don't care about those kids.
there were people who were 'more' mad that people were happy a white supremacist died, 'instead' of being mad at all that kids died.
op wasn't saying those lives were equal to charlie kirk, implying the opposite. the jab was at hypocrites who don't care about those kids.
there were people who were 'more' mad that people were happy a white supremacist died, 'instead' of being mad at all that kids died.
September 11, 2025 at 6:14 PM
okay.
op wasn't saying those lives were equal to charlie kirk, implying the opposite. the jab was at hypocrites who don't care about those kids.
there were people who were 'more' mad that people were happy a white supremacist died, 'instead' of being mad at all that kids died.
op wasn't saying those lives were equal to charlie kirk, implying the opposite. the jab was at hypocrites who don't care about those kids.
there were people who were 'more' mad that people were happy a white supremacist died, 'instead' of being mad at all that kids died.
my dude, my bro. my person. the usa fought an entire war against nazis and killed a lot of them to make them stop doing nazi stuff. don't be a sucker.
September 11, 2025 at 6:11 PM
my dude, my bro. my person. the usa fought an entire war against nazis and killed a lot of them to make them stop doing nazi stuff. don't be a sucker.
do not do the work of people who wish you harm. if they ask you to carry their pack, carry it twice as far.
you do this because rome's roads curve back toward rome and the soldiers would both get in trouble for you walking further than allowed and also because they would be at the start again.
you do this because rome's roads curve back toward rome and the soldiers would both get in trouble for you walking further than allowed and also because they would be at the start again.
September 11, 2025 at 6:10 PM
do not do the work of people who wish you harm. if they ask you to carry their pack, carry it twice as far.
you do this because rome's roads curve back toward rome and the soldiers would both get in trouble for you walking further than allowed and also because they would be at the start again.
you do this because rome's roads curve back toward rome and the soldiers would both get in trouble for you walking further than allowed and also because they would be at the start again.
the sar-chasm. the sar-CHASM. you're on the wrong side of the sarcasm chasm. you're not reading it right.
September 11, 2025 at 5:14 PM
the sar-chasm. the sar-CHASM. you're on the wrong side of the sarcasm chasm. you're not reading it right.
there is no 'should' feel sad for them. there is 'should' feel sad for others in your house or yourself if that person managed to hurt any of you first.
it 'can' be sad. it 'can' be an existential problem to think about how they got that way. it's not deserved, though. stop asking people for it.
it 'can' be sad. it 'can' be an existential problem to think about how they got that way. it's not deserved, though. stop asking people for it.
September 11, 2025 at 4:49 PM
there is no 'should' feel sad for them. there is 'should' feel sad for others in your house or yourself if that person managed to hurt any of you first.
it 'can' be sad. it 'can' be an existential problem to think about how they got that way. it's not deserved, though. stop asking people for it.
it 'can' be sad. it 'can' be an existential problem to think about how they got that way. it's not deserved, though. stop asking people for it.
that's also a type of practical.
it's good that you're holding onto yourself. you still shouldn't be trying to tell other people to feel the same about a net positive. now he can't hurt more people, and cancer wasn't working fast enough.
there was an entire war to stop people like him making camps
it's good that you're holding onto yourself. you still shouldn't be trying to tell other people to feel the same about a net positive. now he can't hurt more people, and cancer wasn't working fast enough.
there was an entire war to stop people like him making camps
September 11, 2025 at 4:46 PM
that's also a type of practical.
it's good that you're holding onto yourself. you still shouldn't be trying to tell other people to feel the same about a net positive. now he can't hurt more people, and cancer wasn't working fast enough.
there was an entire war to stop people like him making camps
it's good that you're holding onto yourself. you still shouldn't be trying to tell other people to feel the same about a net positive. now he can't hurt more people, and cancer wasn't working fast enough.
there was an entire war to stop people like him making camps
i wasn't, i was declaring a stance where sympathy for someone who wanted you dead isn't required, and that it's not productive to ask for it from people who are and were going to be his victims.
other people on this thread were actively saying waffles, though.
other people on this thread were actively saying waffles, though.
September 11, 2025 at 4:40 PM
i wasn't, i was declaring a stance where sympathy for someone who wanted you dead isn't required, and that it's not productive to ask for it from people who are and were going to be his victims.
other people on this thread were actively saying waffles, though.
other people on this thread were actively saying waffles, though.
liberals in canada aren't the same as liberals in the us.
September 11, 2025 at 4:37 PM
liberals in canada aren't the same as liberals in the us.
bad people hurting bad people happens all the time.
September 11, 2025 at 4:37 PM
bad people hurting bad people happens all the time.