And as a bonus, here is a very thorough and empathetic response from Louis Rossmann to PS regarding SKG

LR repairs electronics and digital devices by trade and has been a staunch proponent of the right to repair
He sees SKG as a related issue/cause

youtu.be/TF4zH8bJDI8

The sources are his now-deleted VODs, if you wish to find out more:
archive.org/details/pira...
archive.org/details/pira...

Also, the thumbnails for his videos are him literally throwing SKG in the trash. Like that is extremely toxic and poisoned the discourse before it even got really going

He also often referred to Ross as disingenuous
Describing him as a slimy used car salesman, people that he "hates" and saying it would be impossible to have a conversation with him

And then he explicitly states that it is OK for games to die, to be lost to time, and for customers to lose access

youtu.be/0A1CCc_DClY?...

It would have been totally fair to say he did not want to talk because he was fed up
The sad truth is, though, he never did want to since his first reaction to the initial SKG vid

He never gave dialogue a chance

As stated by him, in a response to a comment from Ross

Addendum:
His complete toxic reaction and refusal to engage in any constructive dialogue from those involved from the very start discredit him even more
Very damming as well is his conviction that it is unnecessary to preserve art/history, and that there is no need to protect basic rights

What is that supposed to mean?
So, can you give any actual, valid criticism of his?
Am genuinely curious here and want to know
Since I can not find you giving his reasons anywhere else

What criticisms of PS are even valid, if I may ask?
Since I watched all of his related vids, I am baffled how wrong he got things
Especially with the point "it would force the game to be supported indefinitely"
His critiques could be considered invalid by default, due to his total misunderstanding

Hell Yeah!!!