My fear is strong, but my determination is stronger!
#Politics #USPolitics #NoKings #FUCKYOUTRUMP

I'm scared of the dangers of protesting, but I'm more scared of what our futures will be like because of this manchild! I'm scared of not being able to vote, I'm scared of being forced to have a child I don't want, I'm scared of not being able to find a job or not being able to find one that's good!

Beautiful! Love Oregon 🩷

Stay vigilant. Keep an eye on the news, and on congress.gov. If you see something that worries you, raise awareness. We need to keep our democracy, or we may lose our livelihood and our lives. (8/8)
If you have a professional interest in this topic and want to correct me, do; I welcome knowledge.

And what will come next is the question?
There could be a bill passed that bans something more important that slips through the cracks.
I may not be an expert in any field, but I am an American citizen, as much as I dislike it, and I need the people to know the truth. (7/8)

And I have not seen any talk about this subclause at all aside from one comment on one YouTube short. This is terrifying, because that means that as long as a bill has an unpopular main clause that can be easily fixed, a subclause can go under the radar. (6/8)

Yes, it has safeguards against the President picking and choosing which applications should be banned. But the important idea is that this bill has this subclause in the first place. The focus was on TikTok. The whole time it was being contemplated, it was TikTok being talked about. (5/8)

(II) a public report to Congress, submitted not less than 30 days before such determination, describing the specific national security concern involved and containing a classified annex and a description of what assets would need to be divested to execute a qualified divestiture."
(4/8)

"(B) a covered company that—
(i) is controlled by a foreign adversary; and
(ii) that is determined by the President to present a significant threat to the national security of the United States following the issuance of—
(I) a public notice proposing such determination; and
(3/8)

Read the bill (linked in the first post). Specifically, section 2, subsection (a)(2)(B).
It mentions a subclause, (g)(3)(B).
I'll make as many replies as I need to quote the subclause fully. (2/8)
www.congress.gov/bill/118th-c...

Losing the Panera death lemonade must've hit hard

Ngl that pork sounds delicious tho even if it sends your heart rate through the roof. Gimme one and I'll die in peace

Found a dub of this comic on YT and needed to find you on Bluesky right away! Instant follow, love the art!

2 cause Patrick Bateman is probably only gonna fantasize about killing me and then not do it, penguinz0 is chill, and so is Kamala.

I've tried, he doesn't seem to be interested

I buy him a mountain of pizzas with no shame

Ooooh. Yeah, that makes sense
Thanks for explaining!