@ayelaitch.bsky.social
It is nearly impossible to sue federal agents -- especially for violations of federal law.
January 12, 2026 at 12:44 AM
It is nearly impossible to sue federal agents -- especially for violations of federal law.
The solution is robust, reliable public transit and a decoupling of car ownership / drivership with basic public life.
December 12, 2025 at 11:09 PM
The solution is robust, reliable public transit and a decoupling of car ownership / drivership with basic public life.
Like they've never done that before.
December 5, 2025 at 8:08 PM
Like they've never done that before.
Despite all the am-pu-ta-tions, you mean?
December 4, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Despite all the am-pu-ta-tions, you mean?
also an early entry into the now, as far as I know,-lapsed B&S tradition of a female co-lead vocal to Murdoch. yielded some of their best work.
December 3, 2025 at 5:22 PM
also an early entry into the now, as far as I know,-lapsed B&S tradition of a female co-lead vocal to Murdoch. yielded some of their best work.
The concern is that ICE is going to descend on MN regardless of the legality of doing so. The effort to point out the lawlessness of Trump’s order here—while noble—could lull bystanders into a false sense of security.
November 22, 2025 at 2:29 AM
The concern is that ICE is going to descend on MN regardless of the legality of doing so. The effort to point out the lawlessness of Trump’s order here—while noble—could lull bystanders into a false sense of security.
That’s absolutely the takeaway here, and the effort to point out the illegality of the action—while noble—may lull people into a false sense of security.
November 22, 2025 at 2:27 AM
That’s absolutely the takeaway here, and the effort to point out the illegality of the action—while noble—may lull people into a false sense of security.
This guy acknowledges that TPS has been cancelled early (and over legal challenge) for Venezuelan nationals just a month ago. So it’s more complicated that what he paints it out as.
November 22, 2025 at 2:10 AM
This guy acknowledges that TPS has been cancelled early (and over legal challenge) for Venezuelan nationals just a month ago. So it’s more complicated that what he paints it out as.
The cognoscenti's supposed "frustration" isn't due to any real (or media-driven) concern or panic. I've seen more discussion on their backlash than the case itself.
It's mostly a function of their vested interest in maintaining the veneer of SCOTUS' credibility despite ample contrary evidence.
It's mostly a function of their vested interest in maintaining the veneer of SCOTUS' credibility despite ample contrary evidence.
November 10, 2025 at 6:03 PM
The cognoscenti's supposed "frustration" isn't due to any real (or media-driven) concern or panic. I've seen more discussion on their backlash than the case itself.
It's mostly a function of their vested interest in maintaining the veneer of SCOTUS' credibility despite ample contrary evidence.
It's mostly a function of their vested interest in maintaining the veneer of SCOTUS' credibility despite ample contrary evidence.
Procedure is a red line -- precisely until the Court thinks it isn't.
The reality is: we don't know why cert. was denied in Davis, but we do know that the Court is rights-skeptical (rights-adverse?). And people are justified in feeling worried about their rights in this environment.
The reality is: we don't know why cert. was denied in Davis, but we do know that the Court is rights-skeptical (rights-adverse?). And people are justified in feeling worried about their rights in this environment.
November 10, 2025 at 3:08 PM
Procedure is a red line -- precisely until the Court thinks it isn't.
The reality is: we don't know why cert. was denied in Davis, but we do know that the Court is rights-skeptical (rights-adverse?). And people are justified in feeling worried about their rights in this environment.
The reality is: we don't know why cert. was denied in Davis, but we do know that the Court is rights-skeptical (rights-adverse?). And people are justified in feeling worried about their rights in this environment.
It's more like, "some people got things wrong, so some people don't know what they're talking about." I would put nothing past this SCOTUS, and I don't think that experts are doing their credibility any favors by thinking there are any red lines.
November 10, 2025 at 2:50 PM
It's more like, "some people got things wrong, so some people don't know what they're talking about." I would put nothing past this SCOTUS, and I don't think that experts are doing their credibility any favors by thinking there are any red lines.
Why is a communist stumping for McKinsey alum Mayor Pete of all people?
November 6, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Why is a communist stumping for McKinsey alum Mayor Pete of all people?
You are impressively wrong.
1. Mayor Pete is not in office and was not during any part of the mayoral race.
2. The Hatch Act doesn't prohibit people in political office from endorsing candidates.
3. You don't even know what you yourself experienced. The Hatch Act doesn't apply to the military.
1. Mayor Pete is not in office and was not during any part of the mayoral race.
2. The Hatch Act doesn't prohibit people in political office from endorsing candidates.
3. You don't even know what you yourself experienced. The Hatch Act doesn't apply to the military.
November 6, 2025 at 2:15 PM
You are impressively wrong.
1. Mayor Pete is not in office and was not during any part of the mayoral race.
2. The Hatch Act doesn't prohibit people in political office from endorsing candidates.
3. You don't even know what you yourself experienced. The Hatch Act doesn't apply to the military.
1. Mayor Pete is not in office and was not during any part of the mayoral race.
2. The Hatch Act doesn't prohibit people in political office from endorsing candidates.
3. You don't even know what you yourself experienced. The Hatch Act doesn't apply to the military.
You are absolutely wrong about this.
November 6, 2025 at 2:07 PM
You are absolutely wrong about this.
Was this your show? youtu.be/b5FjzqwWyiA
yo la tengo - blue line swinger - live 1995 santa monica
YouTube video by tako808
youtu.be
October 27, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Was this your show? youtu.be/b5FjzqwWyiA
a different (and worse) band pre-McNew.
October 22, 2025 at 9:16 PM
a different (and worse) band pre-McNew.
such shitty writing too. one of the worst reviews i've ever read, compositionally speaking.
August 30, 2025 at 3:18 PM
such shitty writing too. one of the worst reviews i've ever read, compositionally speaking.
Saw it last year and can't recommend it enough!
July 13, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Saw it last year and can't recommend it enough!
You are entitled to your opinion w/r/t competency and experience. But the damage as far as "preventing" a Lander win by "running" Mamdani seems to have already been done and past fixing at this point.
But go ahead and recycle Cuomo talking points for little (no?) apparent reason.
But go ahead and recycle Cuomo talking points for little (no?) apparent reason.
June 20, 2025 at 7:55 PM
You are entitled to your opinion w/r/t competency and experience. But the damage as far as "preventing" a Lander win by "running" Mamdani seems to have already been done and past fixing at this point.
But go ahead and recycle Cuomo talking points for little (no?) apparent reason.
But go ahead and recycle Cuomo talking points for little (no?) apparent reason.
What is constructive about your initial comment? What do you hope to add to the discourse? Seems to me like typical establishment gatekeeping.
Maybe you should give the guy who is most likely to beat an untenable option the best opportunity to be your mayor. See how "performative" he is then.
Maybe you should give the guy who is most likely to beat an untenable option the best opportunity to be your mayor. See how "performative" he is then.
June 20, 2025 at 7:39 PM
What is constructive about your initial comment? What do you hope to add to the discourse? Seems to me like typical establishment gatekeeping.
Maybe you should give the guy who is most likely to beat an untenable option the best opportunity to be your mayor. See how "performative" he is then.
Maybe you should give the guy who is most likely to beat an untenable option the best opportunity to be your mayor. See how "performative" he is then.
Rich coming from the guy posting online.
June 20, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Rich coming from the guy posting online.
I believe they are. More info: www.bikemn.org/initiatives/...
Courses For Individuals - Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota
Individual classes are a great way to brush up on your knowledge, practice your skills, and boost your confidence on the bike!
www.bikemn.org
March 21, 2025 at 8:24 PM
I believe they are. More info: www.bikemn.org/initiatives/...
I helped sue MN jails for the same practice while in law school. We found that roughly half of the jails in the state were violating the law, probably to the tune of several million dollars.
February 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM
I helped sue MN jails for the same practice while in law school. We found that roughly half of the jails in the state were violating the law, probably to the tune of several million dollars.
the government, via the remaining lawyers, would need to waive privilege -- so it's not going to happen.
February 18, 2025 at 2:43 PM
the government, via the remaining lawyers, would need to waive privilege -- so it's not going to happen.