To be entirely fair, as far as its been clarified that sorta thing was being said to highlight a point in regards to language if I remember right. However, you can still have a problem with the action regardless of reason.

>:}

I literally dont see it pop up as this other person. Would you be able to screenshot how its popping up for you? Just so I can get a better idea on whats going on w the app.

the evidence to the contrary has either not been as much of a smoking gun as you think it is or has been claims you havent shown any proof to.

Is that how it works? Bc for me it specifically says "Sai replied to Mystic" in my notifications. Unless thats not what you meant then thats on me.

I legitimately wasnt trying to make you think any which way. What I saw was Sai leaving a reply to you asking about slander and then linking the question to the only other reply you left, while replying to me no prob. Which I still dont get why that was the route taken but that parts whatever.

See, at that point youd need 2 prove that the flower thing is part of the default acc. or specific 2 ur server (bc chuulis claim was that the message was from ur server). Also 2 answer an earlier q: not gonna delete the screenshot post, Ill reblog that atm there aisnt enough proof either way.

The post that started this whole thing literally states "ayo can you elaborate" and then asking for proof on your side. I never even claimed to know the og source (the person gallagher got his shot from). The most I claimed is instances where ur attempts at proof didnt actually prove what u wanted.

Girlie, I am asking u for proof to things youre saying. Thats not me saying that the screenshot is real nor that Im a stranger to this other person. Theres a massive diff. The closest to that is me putting quotes on the word original bc u claimed the image to be altered from an og convo.

Ooh! New claim! Okay, whats your proof behind Gallagher having a consistent track record of faking screenshots?

Also measuring authenticity for this screenshot is kinda dumb bc we can literally see that it was doctored to censor out the other party in the convo. The app isnt gonna be able to separate that from any other tampering.

I mean at first it was cause I figured you had some sorta proof to the og convo to show that it was bullshit. But at this point its moreso just funny how far youre going to not pull up the og convo & get the easiest w. (Fyi, those sorta sites arent actually good at proving screenshots 2 b faked)

I wouldn't assume that by default but Sai replied specifically to you on both replies you sent about this. If its not then Im kinda confused on why shed send it to you if it were meant towards me, the person who made the screenshot present first.

Based on the replies, Mystic isnt peddling fake screenshots, shes literally trying to understand a mashup of words. How and where did they slander you?

So your usage of the word "puriteens" would be a smaller search on discord and you can identify where part of the "original" convo is. Meaning youd be able to narrow down where this convo happened. If the screenshots fake then why wouldnt u pull up part of the og to proove it 2 b fake?

A screenshot of you saying "I added this flower back during may" isnt proof. If what you actually said is altered, then showing what the actual messages said would help better than just saying "this screenshot is altered".