I nominate “spaff” for consideration

Gotta up your impression rate somehow George!

to authors during the entire process from write up to presentation (if required).

sessions on the use of paper composition tools such as LaTeX/EasyChair/arXiv etc..

This is just my two cents and I think there will always be arguments for both sides and I have almost certainly missed some important points. But in short, I think that the solution is providing education/support..

the current climate, we should be focused on maintaining as much of that as possible to make validation of these contributions easier.

I also think that the academic institutions authors are affiliated with should be responsible for supporting them during the writing/submission process with..

minimal correction.
I would also say that while it is possible for people to present their contributions in other formats
such as posters or presentations, it is much harder for *anyone* to condense information down into short form pieces without losing important context and I think that in..

Talking from a computer science perspective, I would agree that academic institutions do prioritise neurotypical people but not the discipline as a whole. Most institutions that organise these conferences do provide ways for the modification and verification of paper structure that usually require..