austin
@austinha.bsky.social
i care a lot about systems. in particular, systems of technology, media, education, and governance. fighting for liberatory schools, for creators, and for a free and open internet.
youtube.com/@uncoverage
youtube.com/@uncoverage
they call their product “the Greendale Human Being”
April 13, 2025 at 8:04 PM
they call their product “the Greendale Human Being”
still crazy to me that there is like zero discourse about the TikTok ban coming Saturday.
April 2, 2025 at 9:57 PM
still crazy to me that there is like zero discourse about the TikTok ban coming Saturday.
so what happens when an online community is killed? www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar1S...
TikTok is different now.
YouTube video by uncoverage
www.youtube.com
April 2, 2025 at 9:52 PM
so what happens when an online community is killed? www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar1S...
any pointers to places where threat modeling is happening?
March 30, 2025 at 6:41 PM
any pointers to places where threat modeling is happening?
iirc, core Bluesky design goals are (1) composable moderation (2) global feed, and (3) portable data/accounts.
(2) seems to be the unique thing culturally!
(2) seems to be the unique thing culturally!
March 30, 2025 at 6:19 PM
iirc, core Bluesky design goals are (1) composable moderation (2) global feed, and (3) portable data/accounts.
(2) seems to be the unique thing culturally!
(2) seems to be the unique thing culturally!
on the how that underlies the what:
i will say — my big takeaway from ATmosphere was a fascination with the community’s interest in the Big Thing.
i will say — my big takeaway from ATmosphere was a fascination with the community’s interest in the Big Thing.
March 30, 2025 at 6:19 PM
on the how that underlies the what:
i will say — my big takeaway from ATmosphere was a fascination with the community’s interest in the Big Thing.
i will say — my big takeaway from ATmosphere was a fascination with the community’s interest in the Big Thing.
on the other hand, Google Search was actually displaying copied photos. is it meaningful that the AI industry isn’t?
March 28, 2025 at 1:53 AM
on the other hand, Google Search was actually displaying copied photos. is it meaningful that the AI industry isn’t?
he is saying that the slow motion look changes my perception of what that point is, and i disagree.
i am asking him to prove me wrong here! how does slow motion affect the "reality of the moment", as he puts it?
i am asking him to prove me wrong here! how does slow motion affect the "reality of the moment", as he puts it?
February 3, 2025 at 9:28 PM
he is saying that the slow motion look changes my perception of what that point is, and i disagree.
i am asking him to prove me wrong here! how does slow motion affect the "reality of the moment", as he puts it?
i am asking him to prove me wrong here! how does slow motion affect the "reality of the moment", as he puts it?
if so, you must agree that there is a point at which it becomes unrealistic to call something an "attempt to play".
the question, which he and i disagree on, is what that point is.
the question, which he and i disagree on, is what that point is.
February 3, 2025 at 9:28 PM
if so, you must agree that there is a point at which it becomes unrealistic to call something an "attempt to play".
the question, which he and i disagree on, is what that point is.
the question, which he and i disagree on, is what that point is.
for those that are seeing jeff’s replies here: consider this –
i’m asking how it changes the nature of his attempt.
for example, if Sharangovich was waving his stick in the air while looking at the puck from the far hash mark, would you say that he is making an "attempt" at the play?
no?
i’m asking how it changes the nature of his attempt.
for example, if Sharangovich was waving his stick in the air while looking at the puck from the far hash mark, would you say that he is making an "attempt" at the play?
no?
February 3, 2025 at 9:27 PM
for those that are seeing jeff’s replies here: consider this –
i’m asking how it changes the nature of his attempt.
for example, if Sharangovich was waving his stick in the air while looking at the puck from the far hash mark, would you say that he is making an "attempt" at the play?
no?
i’m asking how it changes the nature of his attempt.
for example, if Sharangovich was waving his stick in the air while looking at the puck from the far hash mark, would you say that he is making an "attempt" at the play?
no?
sorry, to be clear: i’m asking how it changes the nature of his attempt.
for example, if Sharangovich was waving his stick in the air while looking at the puck from the far hash mark, would you say that he is making an "attempt" at the play?
no?
for example, if Sharangovich was waving his stick in the air while looking at the puck from the far hash mark, would you say that he is making an "attempt" at the play?
no?
February 3, 2025 at 9:25 PM
sorry, to be clear: i’m asking how it changes the nature of his attempt.
for example, if Sharangovich was waving his stick in the air while looking at the puck from the far hash mark, would you say that he is making an "attempt" at the play?
no?
for example, if Sharangovich was waving his stick in the air while looking at the puck from the far hash mark, would you say that he is making an "attempt" at the play?
no?
chat, am i talking to a bot?
February 3, 2025 at 9:14 PM
chat, am i talking to a bot?
curious: is incidental contact limited to stick-on-goalie?
February 3, 2025 at 6:22 PM
curious: is incidental contact limited to stick-on-goalie?
how did it change the reality of this moment?
February 3, 2025 at 6:20 PM
how did it change the reality of this moment?
finally, curious about how Schwartz’s goal could be considered different. there is a rebound, both players are attempting to play the puck, Schwartz wins the battle, and nets it.
February 3, 2025 at 4:02 AM
finally, curious about how Schwartz’s goal could be considered different. there is a rebound, both players are attempting to play the puck, Schwartz wins the battle, and nets it.
if you *do* consider this an “attempt” on a loose puck, then i’m not sure what the goalie interference call is for. joey makes this save if his stick is not lifted, or if he is not moved out of the way when his glove is pushed.
February 3, 2025 at 4:01 AM
if you *do* consider this an “attempt” on a loose puck, then i’m not sure what the goalie interference call is for. joey makes this save if his stick is not lifted, or if he is not moved out of the way when his glove is pushed.
another angle showing how far behind the puck is.
February 3, 2025 at 3:59 AM
another angle showing how far behind the puck is.
not sure how you can faithfully say Sharangovich is attempting to play the puck here. he’s a yard in front of it and makes direct contact with Joey’s stick (and then glove). he’s nowhere near to making a play on the puck, so it would be miraculous to call this an attempt, in my opinion.
February 3, 2025 at 3:59 AM
not sure how you can faithfully say Sharangovich is attempting to play the puck here. he’s a yard in front of it and makes direct contact with Joey’s stick (and then glove). he’s nowhere near to making a play on the puck, so it would be miraculous to call this an attempt, in my opinion.