Preliminary slides: osf.io/2w4zh
Webinar schedule and log-in: www.allianzschwerpunkt-digitalitaet.de/2025/09/25/w...

And you know what? Anybody can join these projects and contribute to open science, become part of a large diverse community, and co-author papers.

I agree! We discussed a few reasons why specialized journals are necessary and how they can help together with our colleagues from
@jcre.bsky.social
at www.econstor.eu/handle/10419.... For example, as a non-commercial journal, we can afford to evaluate studies based on quality and not outcomes.

Timestamped link (27:48): youtu.be/0NJ87tYE8_s?... from #PCI webinar by @deevybee.bsky.social

Also, I think this is a great opportunity to conduct a reproduction/replication that you can later submit to our new replication journal 👀

It also depends on if you are discussing a theory or a finding/phenomenon. A single failed replication could falsify an entire theory but it could not raise doubts over a phenomenon as easily. We discuss this a bit here: forrt.org/replication_...

I think I generally agree. For some cases it is much easier than making a pair of shoes, though (eg online replications in ML1). There are cases where it is then up to the original authors to show that their finding was not a false positive.