Audun Rosslund
audunrosslund.bsky.social
Audun Rosslund
@audunrosslund.bsky.social
babies are cool
These results challenge the idea that infant-directed speech (primarily) serves a didactic function for language learning, highlighting instead its social and emotional role in early parent-infant communication.

Data, code, and preregistration at osf.io/s8zrm

/end
OSF
osf.io
November 4, 2025 at 3:20 PM
That is, parents do not spontaneously adjust the acoustic features of words based on whether they think their infant knows them or not! /3
November 4, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Analysing 38,000+ speech segments from Norwegian parents interacting with their 8–18-month-olds, we found that neither pitch, pitch variation, vowel length, nor vowel clarity differed depending on infants’ presumed knowledge of a word. /2
November 4, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Good question, we speculate about both, as well as overall social and cognitive maturation! But this is an avenue for future work for sure!
May 6, 2025 at 2:52 PM
We invite others to explore and use the child-to-caregiver ratio in their own work via our open Shiny app calculator: 👉 socialnet.uiocloud.no/socialApp/ct... (warning; slow load!). Open data, code, and preregistration: osf.io/pjn8k/ /end
socialnet.uiocloud.no
May 6, 2025 at 11:15 AM
This shift from thinking in terms of birth order to household balance, from siblings as “resource competitors” to potential "language facilitators", offers a more holistic view of how family structure may shape early language development. 5/
May 6, 2025 at 11:15 AM
As it turns out, the best predictor of infants' vocabulary sizes (over and beyond birth order) was when older siblings were considered "caregivers" from early adolescence, and (the twist): sisters 1–3 years earlier than brothers! 👧💬 4/
May 6, 2025 at 11:15 AM
To make better sense of this, we introduced a new metric: the child-to-caregiver ratio, a data-driven measure of how many "caregivers" (parents and old-enough siblings) a child has relative to the number of children in the household. A lower ratio was associated with larger vocabularies. 3/
May 6, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Using parent-reported data from 6,000+ Norwegian infants (8–36 months), we found that expressive and receptive vocabulary sizes tends to decrease with additional older siblings... but only up to a point. For later-borns, vocab. actually starts increasing again. 2/
May 6, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Consonants, like vowels, appear to be less distinct in IDS than ADS, thus reinforcing the interpretation that IDS may serve an attentional and/or affective aim, rather than a didactic purpose. /end
January 10, 2025 at 9:45 AM
We did not find any association between features of VOTs and infants' consonant production and/or babbling as reported by parents. This held whether VOTs were operationalised as the IDS input itself or parents' adjustment/effort in IDS from their ADS. 4/
January 10, 2025 at 9:45 AM
We found that, compared to adult-directed speech, voiceless stops in IDS had longer VOTs, while voiced stops had shorter, leading to overall less distinct consonant contrasts (/b-p/, /d-t/, /g-k/) in IDS than ADS. From 6 to 12 months, VOTs in IDS became more similar to ADS. 3/
January 10, 2025 at 9:45 AM
We examined voice onset time (VOT)—the interval between a consonant's release and vocal fold vibration, which distinguishes voiced and voiceless stops (e.g., /b/-/p/)—in speech recorded during shared reading interactions in Norwegian parent-infant and parent-experimenter dyads. 2/
January 10, 2025 at 9:45 AM
Data, code and materials to the study is of course openly available at OSF. Watch this space for whether and how these parents' acoustic properties relate to their infants’ language skills! /end
November 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM
Our results show that IDS is both dynamic and static, and we suggest that future studies should investigate how the acoustic constants and variations influence the proposed attentional, socio-emotional, and linguistic functions of speech to infants. 7/
November 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM
We also found that IDS was characterized by increased vowel variability and decreased vowel distinction, and more so in mothers and fathers, with no change with infant age. In other words, this highlights that IDS is not across-the-board ‘clear’ input. 6/
November 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM
Analyses of vowel space expansion (vowel hyperarticulation) told a more complicated story; While fathers’ overall expanded their vowel space in IDS, mothers did not, perhaps as they appeared to shift from vowel space reduction to expansion with infant age. 5/
November 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM
What did we find? Compared to their ADS, both mothers and fathers’ IDS had: Higher pitch, wider pitch range, slower articulation rate, and longer vowels. With infant age, pitch range widened and vowels shortened, while pitch and articulation rate remained relatively stable. 4/
November 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM
We followed 69 Norwegian families for one year and five lab sessions, from infants were 6–18 months. Parents’ speech were recorded while reading the same picture book to their infant (IDS), and to an experimenter (ADS), ensuring no distortion from different linguistic content of speech. 3/
November 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM
First things first, this was only possible because of the great team of Natalia Kartushina, @julienmayor.bsky.social, @acristia.bsky.social, Arun Singh, Roger Mundry, fantastic RAs and helpful reviewers! 2/
November 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM