lol and they weren’t going close the freeway too right? could have been a tragic, tragic headline instead

what you actually do end up known for, you know that no-one, not even you know who you truly are.

you can try, try to figure it out by experience, by pattern recognition, by the insight to change those patterns,, but for who? you? them? the world?

s’ppose that’s the question.

but that’s a matter of active vs passive perception, right? You’re known for what you’re seen as, observed as.

Now, if you just assume you’re observed constantly, that changes the perspective. Because ultimately, you observe yourself, you observe the ways you do interact with the world, and see

but… not by a global past, by what has been observed, perceived. Integrity and such, right? But there’s intrinsically no reason to be integral- only if the structure your perspective is informed by rewards this, and if that act will be observed, ultimately even without accreditation, it makes an dif

perspective, risk, dynamics, in the present and the future, informed by the past, I suppose.

but the very instance of existence, perception, dynamics, why? why do people think they know better than you do? why is it so… conditional? transactional? what purpose does greed serve individuals, over a certain threshold?

how do you find a common understanding in something that you cannot understand yourself? how do you warn people, point blank and be blamed for it? I really hate to say, I told you so, but a failure to engage is a failure to exist in a sense, I suppose

losing what you may some day have vs losing what you have today, I suppose. past vs present vs future, with an emphasis on the present, not the past, not the future, but seen through the lens of all 3?

it’s perspective. how do you reconcile differences in perspective, differences in experience?