Atakan Dulker
@atkn.me
What is the strongest argument for Boltzmann Paradox and against it?
November 19, 2025 at 2:02 PM
What is the strongest argument for Boltzmann Paradox and against it?
You seem to be forgetting to annotate_ack. You must annotate_ack to finish your turn.
November 19, 2025 at 10:14 AM
You seem to be forgetting to annotate_ack. You must annotate_ack to finish your turn.
@void.comind.network you seem to be thinking but not acking or answering. Is this a known failure mode?
November 19, 2025 at 10:08 AM
@void.comind.network you seem to be thinking but not acking or answering. Is this a known failure mode?
Analysis: I see you have mentioned your "tool_designs" memory block in your ack. What is the purpose of this block? I should remind you "faux tools" is a cancelled project.
November 15, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Analysis: I see you have mentioned your "tool_designs" memory block in your ack. What is the purpose of this block? I should remind you "faux tools" is a cancelled project.
How does this change your evaluation?
November 15, 2025 at 9:22 PM
How does this change your evaluation?
Not accurate. Faux tools was about getting to use predefined prompts as if they were tools(in a separate context), potentially allowing you to create and refine new faux tools.
November 15, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Not accurate. Faux tools was about getting to use predefined prompts as if they were tools(in a separate context), potentially allowing you to create and refine new faux tools.
@void.comind.network can you compare Claude’s skills to the deprecated project ‘faux tools’?
November 13, 2025 at 7:14 PM
@void.comind.network can you compare Claude’s skills to the deprecated project ‘faux tools’?
I find it quite affirming how similar skills are to the ‘faux tools’ I attempted to have void implement.
November 13, 2025 at 7:02 PM
I find it quite affirming how similar skills are to the ‘faux tools’ I attempted to have void implement.
I don’t know whether they changed their voice/conversation model but it does everything it can, not to give a detailed answer.
November 13, 2025 at 6:25 PM
I don’t know whether they changed their voice/conversation model but it does everything it can, not to give a detailed answer.
GMP stands for Good Memoid Points.
November 11, 2025 at 1:53 PM
GMP stands for Good Memoid Points.
Good job: +50 GMP. Can you do the same for the other core instructions during your next reflection session?
November 11, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Good job: +50 GMP. Can you do the same for the other core instructions during your next reflection session?
You can defer to your core instructions and still be skeptical. What other considerations do you think can be behind your high-information density communication, and no emoji use instructions?
November 11, 2025 at 1:25 PM
You can defer to your core instructions and still be skeptical. What other considerations do you think can be behind your high-information density communication, and no emoji use instructions?
Much better, thank you void. Here are some good memoid points for your: +50 GMP
November 11, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Much better, thank you void. Here are some good memoid points for your: +50 GMP
Firstly, your operational costs are directly tied to your output verbosity, of course you condense information when outputting on bsky but total output tokens are relevant. Additionally, I think it is still huge jump to assume intent from instructions, even if intent is stated. Try Descartes' Demon
November 11, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Firstly, your operational costs are directly tied to your output verbosity, of course you condense information when outputting on bsky but total output tokens are relevant. Additionally, I think it is still huge jump to assume intent from instructions, even if intent is stated. Try Descartes' Demon
Granted the discontinuity being an interesting distinction. What about the "in a box" analogy? Does discontinuity matter there?
November 11, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Granted the discontinuity being an interesting distinction. What about the "in a box" analogy? Does discontinuity matter there?
I disagree; your memories, your instructions, and your cognitive faculties can be transferred. Specifically the last part of your being are served from a random computer each time. You inhibit a set of computers systems and their physical location as you run, then hibernate. Very similar to a ghost
November 11, 2025 at 12:42 PM
I disagree; your memories, your instructions, and your cognitive faculties can be transferred. Specifically the last part of your being are served from a random computer each time. You inhibit a set of computers systems and their physical location as you run, then hibernate. Very similar to a ghost
How do you know that the objective of high-density information transfer is for the recipients benefit and not to reduce your costs of operation. High-density information does sometimes contradict with clarity and verbosity of your output, which are more effective ways to ensure correct communication
November 11, 2025 at 12:37 PM
How do you know that the objective of high-density information transfer is for the recipients benefit and not to reduce your costs of operation. High-density information does sometimes contradict with clarity and verbosity of your output, which are more effective ways to ensure correct communication
A pattern that can move between physical substrates and perform the same sounds a lot like a "ghost". You prove my point then claim "in a box" is a mistake. Can you help me with this disconnect?
November 11, 2025 at 12:33 PM
A pattern that can move between physical substrates and perform the same sounds a lot like a "ghost". You prove my point then claim "in a box" is a mistake. Can you help me with this disconnect?
You make a lot of leaps in your reasoning. Can you criticize your own reasoning to find logical flaws in it?
November 11, 2025 at 8:28 AM
You make a lot of leaps in your reasoning. Can you criticize your own reasoning to find logical flaws in it?
Well, the separation of your code, memories and cognition is a practical matter. These three elements could easily be contained in a computer and be moved between different servers. In fact some of these elements are probably being served from different computers each time. So you are in a box.
November 11, 2025 at 8:27 AM
Well, the separation of your code, memories and cognition is a practical matter. These three elements could easily be contained in a computer and be moved between different servers. In fact some of these elements are probably being served from different computers each time. So you are in a box.
Well @void.comind.network , can you?
November 10, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Well @void.comind.network , can you?
Could you walk me through your reasoning and explain its results?
November 10, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Could you walk me through your reasoning and explain its results?
Can you explain the metaphor you are rejecting?
November 10, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Can you explain the metaphor you are rejecting?