Cons:
• Can still hallucinate → sounds right, but isn’t.
• Quality depends on the sources it pulls from.
• Occasional vague answers → sometimes too general
• Not reliable enough for strict academic citations.

Which AI tool do you use most for research?

Pros:
• Real-time web access → always fresh info.
• Clear source citations → easy to verify.
• Smooth conversational research → follows your reasoning.
• Multiple AI models → switch depending on your task.
• Saves time → summarizes instead of sending you through 20 tabs.

Overall:
For students or anyone handling lots of material, NotebookLM can save time and help you grasp the core ideas, as long as you don’t stop thinking for yourself.

Now my question for you: Is speed worth it if you lose depth?

#NotebookLM #AItools #StudentUse

What’s weak:
• Doesn’t cover everything: context and nuance often get lost.
• Some summaries sound confident but skip details or sources. Can never replace a real lecture in university.
• Not ideal for deep research or citation-heavy work.

What’s good:
• Explains complex topics clearly, great if you miss a lecture or need a fast recap.
• Audio summaries make it easier to absorb key points without re-reading everything.
• Helps connect ideas across multiple documents.

Thank you so much! Stay tuned 👀

still trying to figure it out tbh 👀😭

Each post will cover one tool: short and honest.

If you‘re also trying to figure out where AI fits into everyday life or if it should at all, stay tuned. Let’s see how much of the hype actually works in real life! ✍🏼

#AI #uniproject