My point being: if you want to make such statements, good. But make them consistently so that people who care can make an informed purchase independently of the quality of the game; or don't make them at all otherwise it's just obvious bias and favouritism.

(early XSEED localisations from old Falcom titles) or companies supporting genocide, war or repression of people (Owlcat) or just in general bad work environments (EA, blizzard).

For example @rpgsite.net did it recently with The Outer Worlds 2. While the score hasn't suffered from the comment, it was striking because they barely (if not never) did it before, even when reviewing games from companies who stole from the past

The issue I see the most with such reviews is that they are inconsistent. Either you make such comments in all reviews on your website and treat everyone the same or you don't make them at all.

I see so many websites doing so sporadically, it's hard to take them seriously.

Congrats on the release!

Well done!

While I appreciate the idea of UBI, anyone thinking it will solve their problems has a deep misunderstanding on how capitalism actually works

Someone has never played Runaway or (more recently) LocoMotive

At least today I finished #FinalFantasyIX again, masterpiece, so I finish the day in a good mood.

A space for the unbound!