Like this?

NYT just isn’t doing great journalism anymore

I wrote back to arXiv and said "if this is an accepted publication, and you are refusing it, then can you please explain why April Fool's Joke papers are allowed?" They responded with a link for how to appeal their decision - but it seemed to say that if I give the RNAAS link, then it should be good

I have two additional projects that my students are already working on, so more to come in the future.

And one surprising thing, around WR 48a, which is in a cluster of stars, we not only find the dust shells - we find dusty clumps or young stars that look like the Orion proplyds.

This allowed us to measure how old the oldest detected dust was based on knowing the orbital periods of the systems. The dust was up to hundreds of years old!

Immediately, we were able see a large dust structure around each binary. We also managed to measure radial profiles in some directions allowing us to see how many shells we detect:

After we found the dust survived in this harsh environment, I led a team to ask the question: Is it long-lived for all of the harsh environments? So, we proposed for JWST observations in Cycle 2, and finally had observations taken last summer. Here are the four systems we observed

This paper was the result of a follow-up on the famous WR 140 image from JWST

I submitted mine early (Monday late?) and the number was 6201.