Den Hala
@asrahn.bsky.social
"In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face"
"Kriget"
Flammans definition av vad anses konsekvent vänsterjournalistik är föga oväntat helt definierat utefter mängden prenumenanter och därmed hur bra det går businessmässigt.
Framgångsrik vänsterjournalism är när en bunt sossar kastar pengar på ens tidning.
Flammans definition av vad anses konsekvent vänsterjournalistik är föga oväntat helt definierat utefter mängden prenumenanter och därmed hur bra det går businessmässigt.
Framgångsrik vänsterjournalism är när en bunt sossar kastar pengar på ens tidning.
November 8, 2025 at 12:53 AM
"Kriget"
Flammans definition av vad anses konsekvent vänsterjournalistik är föga oväntat helt definierat utefter mängden prenumenanter och därmed hur bra det går businessmässigt.
Framgångsrik vänsterjournalism är när en bunt sossar kastar pengar på ens tidning.
Flammans definition av vad anses konsekvent vänsterjournalistik är föga oväntat helt definierat utefter mängden prenumenanter och därmed hur bra det går businessmässigt.
Framgångsrik vänsterjournalism är när en bunt sossar kastar pengar på ens tidning.
Reaktionen när någon fattig försöker använda gröt-checken för att lösa ut en snusdosa
October 26, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Reaktionen när någon fattig försöker använda gröt-checken för att lösa ut en snusdosa
"Texten må innehålla öppen rasbiologi, antisemitism och hänvisningar till Lebensraum, men den är inte 'primärt' antisemitisk så jag tycker faktiskt det är missvisande att kalla den det."
Flamman.jpg
Flamman.jpg
October 20, 2025 at 2:17 AM
"Texten må innehålla öppen rasbiologi, antisemitism och hänvisningar till Lebensraum, men den är inte 'primärt' antisemitisk så jag tycker faktiskt det är missvisande att kalla den det."
Flamman.jpg
Flamman.jpg
Man I wonder why the Americans are so happy about her-
oh
oh
October 10, 2025 at 12:12 PM
Man I wonder why the Americans are so happy about her-
oh
oh
The fastest way of showing you have no internal moral consistency to your world view, on any social media, is sticking these side by side in your profile.
October 5, 2025 at 2:30 AM
The fastest way of showing you have no internal moral consistency to your world view, on any social media, is sticking these side by side in your profile.
En avdankad vänsterpartist, en sosse, och en moderat som slår kuken i border vid allmänna sammankomster, vilket sällskap.
October 1, 2025 at 9:19 AM
En avdankad vänsterpartist, en sosse, och en moderat som slår kuken i border vid allmänna sammankomster, vilket sällskap.
Måste vara hemskt, detta.
September 26, 2025 at 8:29 AM
Måste vara hemskt, detta.
En dag har Flammans alla medarbetare blockat mig, och den dagen är jag fri.
August 23, 2025 at 7:17 PM
En dag har Flammans alla medarbetare blockat mig, och den dagen är jag fri.
Värt också att notera hur FFÖ står i frågan. Detta postades i samma tid som Israel hade mördat fler civila än Hamas under 7 Oktober, sådär en vecka efteråt. Dessa organisationer uppmärksammar också såklart äkta antisemitism, men att låtsas att de är neutrala när det kommer till Israel är ohederligt.
August 23, 2025 at 4:47 PM
Värt också att notera hur FFÖ står i frågan. Detta postades i samma tid som Israel hade mördat fler civila än Hamas under 7 Oktober, sådär en vecka efteråt. Dessa organisationer uppmärksammar också såklart äkta antisemitism, men att låtsas att de är neutrala när det kommer till Israel är ohederligt.
This is why I don't view Citizens United as being "directly about" Hillary Clinton. The operations of the interest group in question speaks to a larger plan and project, which the Clintons, again, were an obstacle to. So they like everyone else had to be smeared and removed as well as could be.
August 10, 2025 at 3:55 PM
This is why I don't view Citizens United as being "directly about" Hillary Clinton. The operations of the interest group in question speaks to a larger plan and project, which the Clintons, again, were an obstacle to. So they like everyone else had to be smeared and removed as well as could be.
Like here's the original exchange that Deminarray decided to put me on full blast in front of his 2000 followers for. Do you really disagree with my assertion here? Am I completely out of pocket for noting how Citizens United (as a group and ruling) isn't just all about the Clintons?
August 10, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Like here's the original exchange that Deminarray decided to put me on full blast in front of his 2000 followers for. Do you really disagree with my assertion here? Am I completely out of pocket for noting how Citizens United (as a group and ruling) isn't just all about the Clintons?
No, I'm contesting the idea that Citizens United was "Actually Directly About Hillary Clinton", as in terms of exclusivity. Like this was an exchange well over an hour ago, pushing 2 hours, and I've kept repeating this same point over and over.
August 10, 2025 at 3:16 PM
No, I'm contesting the idea that Citizens United was "Actually Directly About Hillary Clinton", as in terms of exclusivity. Like this was an exchange well over an hour ago, pushing 2 hours, and I've kept repeating this same point over and over.
Because the narrative you are defending, is, again, that Citizens United v. FEC is "directly about Hillary Clinton", and the history you bring up is meant to emphasize that. I disagree and I have explained, many times, why I disagree about this assertion.
August 10, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Because the narrative you are defending, is, again, that Citizens United v. FEC is "directly about Hillary Clinton", and the history you bring up is meant to emphasize that. I disagree and I have explained, many times, why I disagree about this assertion.
This then warped about people defending OPs assertion that Citizens United v. FEC was "directly about" Hillary Clinton. This is what I've been arguing against since then - that she was a part of what CU viewed as an obstacle to what they wanted, but that the ruling wasn't "about" Hillary.
August 10, 2025 at 2:51 PM
This then warped about people defending OPs assertion that Citizens United v. FEC was "directly about" Hillary Clinton. This is what I've been arguing against since then - that she was a part of what CU viewed as an obstacle to what they wanted, but that the ruling wasn't "about" Hillary.
I'm not whitewashing anything. The fact that Citizens United saw the Clintons as a negative on the path to attaining their campaign finance reform goals is something I've mentioned all over this conversation, which is why one of the docus was about them. But it wasn't "DIRECTLY ABOUT" them.
August 10, 2025 at 2:09 PM
I'm not whitewashing anything. The fact that Citizens United saw the Clintons as a negative on the path to attaining their campaign finance reform goals is something I've mentioned all over this conversation, which is why one of the docus was about them. But it wasn't "DIRECTLY ABOUT" them.
Very well, read back and by all means look at the screenshot I keep providing and explain to me how Citizens United v. FEC is "directly about Hillary Clinton".
August 10, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Very well, read back and by all means look at the screenshot I keep providing and explain to me how Citizens United v. FEC is "directly about Hillary Clinton".
Oh no, they were explicitly referring to the documentary, unless you think the ruling itself was "directly about Hillary Clinton".
It wasn't even their first shot at campaign finance reform through documentary making they did. As y'all have said in here, at least "read the wiki background section".
It wasn't even their first shot at campaign finance reform through documentary making they did. As y'all have said in here, at least "read the wiki background section".
August 10, 2025 at 2:00 PM
Oh no, they were explicitly referring to the documentary, unless you think the ruling itself was "directly about Hillary Clinton".
It wasn't even their first shot at campaign finance reform through documentary making they did. As y'all have said in here, at least "read the wiki background section".
It wasn't even their first shot at campaign finance reform through documentary making they did. As y'all have said in here, at least "read the wiki background section".
The big "misunderstanding" here was that Demsinarray genuinely thought I was specifically referring to only the Documentary, hence his commentary about it being "directly about" Hillary Clinton. Probably because this was the first time he had engaged even with the wiki page of the ruling.
August 10, 2025 at 1:55 PM
The big "misunderstanding" here was that Demsinarray genuinely thought I was specifically referring to only the Documentary, hence his commentary about it being "directly about" Hillary Clinton. Probably because this was the first time he had engaged even with the wiki page of the ruling.
Liberals are literally the most ignorant people on the planet whose only understanding of politics is a team sports orientation of Red VS Blue where hero worship of politicians who don't care about them are pitted like Pokemon against perceived evil.
August 10, 2025 at 1:29 PM
Liberals are literally the most ignorant people on the planet whose only understanding of politics is a team sports orientation of Red VS Blue where hero worship of politicians who don't care about them are pitted like Pokemon against perceived evil.
Kristdemokraternas mask glider av mer och mer när de Fascistiska impulserna inte längre hålls tillbaka av övriga samhället.
August 6, 2025 at 10:35 PM
Kristdemokraternas mask glider av mer och mer när de Fascistiska impulserna inte längre hålls tillbaka av övriga samhället.
What kind of argument even is this? Was calls to end anti-asian violence used to curb vaccination efforts or other measures meant to prevent covid spread? No, but antisemitism allegations certainly are used to silence criticism of Israel. This is a nonsense comparison.
August 4, 2025 at 10:25 AM
What kind of argument even is this? Was calls to end anti-asian violence used to curb vaccination efforts or other measures meant to prevent covid spread? No, but antisemitism allegations certainly are used to silence criticism of Israel. This is a nonsense comparison.