You think “dissent” as historically defined necessarily includes an attempt to violently stop the proceedings of the most fundamental democratic process?

And guess what… those ppl still got their due process.

No you didn’t lol, you’re talking about a private platform I’m talking about actions done by a govt

That ain’t it, though lol. Totally wrong conclusion.

Sure, can’t argue with that. It’s also capitulation. I won’t be leaving though.

Ezra Klein does a good interview about the emergency that discusses this, and how the Bush admin would at least try to not get on the wrong side of the courts.

News: unprecedented fascist rollback of rights in progress on the US!

“Awesome” guy: bUt MuH gEnDuRr BiNaReEe”

You need to decide where your line is. Lotta ppl today complain that Germans on the Reich rolled over without armed resistance.

Classic topic change of the average simp for fascism.

Ppl do this when they have no interest in questioning their own allegiance to the bad actors currently being discussed.

Tired as it is obvious

Tiresome, debunked hot take and it’s sad that maga still falls for it, but then again the goal is criminalization of all dissent so this makes sense