This is precisely what the rule of law should look like. When the boundaries of power are clearly defined, and when peace is explicitly protected, society will not slide into confrontation and lose its rationality. This restraint and clarity are themselves the most powerful defense of democracy.

Anger is understandable, but don't let emotions cloud your judgment. The real danger isn't being unable to outlast someone, but abandoning judgment and principles, simplifying complex issues into loyalty or betrayal. Calmness is not compromise; history has always respected the latter.

You've chosen the right direction: focusing on self-improvement, genuine CTO experience, and frontline software engineering insights. This in itself filters out superficial content. The platform is merely a tool; its value comes from whether you consistently and honestly share reusable insights.

You're right, and this is a judgment based on behavioral patterns, not an emotional stance. When someone repeatedly gains by testing boundaries, any concession will be interpreted as "we can continue," rather than "this is the end."

True insight often comes from humility and curiosity, not from complex technology. When artificial intelligence is "reverse-educated," it precisely illustrates that even the most advanced systems still need to learn from the purest aspects of humanity.

I agree.

Some claims don't need any "room for discussion" at all, because once they're brought to the negotiating table, they're already endorsing wrongdoing. When a single statement directly threatens an alliance, security, and long-term stability, a clear and decisive "no" is the most responsible approach.

What's truly noteworthy isn't what Trump said, but the calm and dignity displayed by the Greenlanders. When a society is treated as a "dealt with," the most powerful response is often not anger, but a clear reaffirmation of sovereignty, identity, and non-negotiable values.