Adam Sanborn
@asanborn.bsky.social
Professor in Psychology at Warwick in the UK. Interested in computational models of human behaviour/behavior.
With Nick Chater, @mmrobinson93.bsky.social, Wenjia Joyce Zhao, Jake Spicer, and C. Stella Qian.
2/2
2/2
June 6, 2025 at 3:40 PM
With Nick Chater, @mmrobinson93.bsky.social, Wenjia Joyce Zhao, Jake Spicer, and C. Stella Qian.
2/2
2/2
Thanks to the tremendous team of Jian-Qiao Zhu, Jake Spicer, @pleonv.bsky.social, @lcastillo.bsky.social, Johanna Falbén, @yunxiao-li.bsky.social, @aidan-sj-tee.bsky.social, and Nick Chater (4/4)
March 4, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Thanks to the tremendous team of Jian-Qiao Zhu, Jake Spicer, @pleonv.bsky.social, @lcastillo.bsky.social, Johanna Falbén, @yunxiao-li.bsky.social, @aidan-sj-tee.bsky.social, and Nick Chater (4/4)
This noise could be due to the brain approximating probabilistic inference with local sampling.
If so, it could be a feature rather than a bug, as it allows exploration of alternative interpretations of the world. (3/4)
If so, it could be a feature rather than a bug, as it allows exploration of alternative interpretations of the world. (3/4)
March 4, 2025 at 10:33 PM
This noise could be due to the brain approximating probabilistic inference with local sampling.
If so, it could be a feature rather than a bug, as it allows exploration of alternative interpretations of the world. (3/4)
If so, it could be a feature rather than a bug, as it allows exploration of alternative interpretations of the world. (3/4)
It reviews the surprising structure of variability in human behaviour, discussing how much of it could be noise in cognitive computations. (2/4)
March 4, 2025 at 10:33 PM
It reviews the surprising structure of variability in human behaviour, discussing how much of it could be noise in cognitive computations. (2/4)