Remmelt 🛑
@artificialbodies.net
Stop Big Tech that:
- launders our data
- dehumanises workers
- lobbies for unsafe uses
- pollutes our environment
Short book on how AI corps get destructive:
https://artificialbodies.net/artificial-bodies-preface-7042453348de
- launders our data
- dehumanises workers
- lobbies for unsafe uses
- pollutes our environment
Short book on how AI corps get destructive:
https://artificialbodies.net/artificial-bodies-preface-7042453348de
Tech execs do not feel about the world the same way we do. We need to mind that.
November 8, 2025 at 6:16 AM
Tech execs do not feel about the world the same way we do. We need to mind that.
Lawyer jumps on stage to subpoena Sam Altman.
November 7, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Lawyer jumps on stage to subpoena Sam Altman.
Narrow visions serve OpenAI’s strategy of manipulating our culture for gain.
That’s how Sam Altman scaled extractive start-ups. And how he now debases the very concept of non-profit charity.
They don’t care about you. “Care” is just pretty packaging for a product to be sold.
That’s how Sam Altman scaled extractive start-ups. And how he now debases the very concept of non-profit charity.
They don’t care about you. “Care” is just pretty packaging for a product to be sold.
November 3, 2025 at 5:36 AM
Narrow visions serve OpenAI’s strategy of manipulating our culture for gain.
That’s how Sam Altman scaled extractive start-ups. And how he now debases the very concept of non-profit charity.
They don’t care about you. “Care” is just pretty packaging for a product to be sold.
That’s how Sam Altman scaled extractive start-ups. And how he now debases the very concept of non-profit charity.
They don’t care about you. “Care” is just pretty packaging for a product to be sold.
OpenAI Foundation will invest in the infrastructure needed for OpenAI to make money.
It’s a fraud of a non-profit: pretending to contribute to the commons, while actually covering the healthcare data and cybersecurity and whatever else can be offloaded by the for-profit entity.
It’s a fraud of a non-profit: pretending to contribute to the commons, while actually covering the healthcare data and cybersecurity and whatever else can be offloaded by the for-profit entity.
November 3, 2025 at 5:34 AM
OpenAI Foundation will invest in the infrastructure needed for OpenAI to make money.
It’s a fraud of a non-profit: pretending to contribute to the commons, while actually covering the healthcare data and cybersecurity and whatever else can be offloaded by the for-profit entity.
It’s a fraud of a non-profit: pretending to contribute to the commons, while actually covering the healthcare data and cybersecurity and whatever else can be offloaded by the for-profit entity.
That sounds right!
And it is also worse, because we’re not just going through a (hidden) middle person. But we’re actually getting tied up to the corporate machines and disconnected from each other.
I wrote about it here:
And it is also worse, because we’re not just going through a (hidden) middle person. But we’re actually getting tied up to the corporate machines and disconnected from each other.
I wrote about it here:
November 3, 2025 at 12:42 AM
That sounds right!
And it is also worse, because we’re not just going through a (hidden) middle person. But we’re actually getting tied up to the corporate machines and disconnected from each other.
I wrote about it here:
And it is also worse, because we’re not just going through a (hidden) middle person. But we’re actually getting tied up to the corporate machines and disconnected from each other.
I wrote about it here:
Just heard after 27 years, the host of ‘In Our Time’ is finally quitting 🥲
Interview with historians on the life of William Blake – poet, artist, and radical activist of his time (h/t to a friend)
www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b...
Interview with historians on the life of William Blake – poet, artist, and radical activist of his time (h/t to a friend)
www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b...
October 30, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Just heard after 27 years, the host of ‘In Our Time’ is finally quitting 🥲
Interview with historians on the life of William Blake – poet, artist, and radical activist of his time (h/t to a friend)
www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b...
Interview with historians on the life of William Blake – poet, artist, and radical activist of his time (h/t to a friend)
www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b...
I’m waiting for aipets.com
“No longer will you order pet food. Just hang out behind your screen with your favourite woofwoof”
“No longer will you order pet food. Just hang out behind your screen with your favourite woofwoof”
October 29, 2025 at 12:22 AM
I’m waiting for aipets.com
“No longer will you order pet food. Just hang out behind your screen with your favourite woofwoof”
“No longer will you order pet food. Just hang out behind your screen with your favourite woofwoof”
On propaganda, it is telling that this tweet popped up first just now when I opened twitter.
October 28, 2025 at 11:56 PM
On propaganda, it is telling that this tweet popped up first just now when I opened twitter.
This part hits:
“I also wish that the many, exhausted activists who didn’t take money from Google or Facebook could have even a quarter of the attention, status and authority the Prodigal Techbro assumes is his birth-right.”
“I also wish that the many, exhausted activists who didn’t take money from Google or Facebook could have even a quarter of the attention, status and authority the Prodigal Techbro assumes is his birth-right.”
October 28, 2025 at 6:24 AM
This part hits:
“I also wish that the many, exhausted activists who didn’t take money from Google or Facebook could have even a quarter of the attention, status and authority the Prodigal Techbro assumes is his birth-right.”
“I also wish that the many, exhausted activists who didn’t take money from Google or Facebook could have even a quarter of the attention, status and authority the Prodigal Techbro assumes is his birth-right.”
It’s weird how I trusted Ed Zitron to mean well (despite the disingenuous promotion of ideas I noticed sometimes) because he told me didn’t like Gary in part because of his attacks on you.
This is just shit:
This is just shit:
October 28, 2025 at 4:49 AM
It’s weird how I trusted Ed Zitron to mean well (despite the disingenuous promotion of ideas I noticed sometimes) because he told me didn’t like Gary in part because of his attacks on you.
This is just shit:
This is just shit:
WTF, Zitron felt like a disingenuous/narrow-minded promoter of ideas sometimes, but I didn’t know it was this bad.
October 28, 2025 at 4:44 AM
WTF, Zitron felt like a disingenuous/narrow-minded promoter of ideas sometimes, but I didn’t know it was this bad.
October 27, 2025 at 6:27 AM
We need to hone in on the companies and the sociopathic techbros who climbed to the top.
Talking about “AI” as some separate entity that’ll take over the world is a distraction.
I even wrote a book about it:
Talking about “AI” as some separate entity that’ll take over the world is a distraction.
I even wrote a book about it:
October 27, 2025 at 5:56 AM
We need to hone in on the companies and the sociopathic techbros who climbed to the top.
Talking about “AI” as some separate entity that’ll take over the world is a distraction.
I even wrote a book about it:
Talking about “AI” as some separate entity that’ll take over the world is a distraction.
I even wrote a book about it:
The most extreme form of eugenics ideology.
It’s like Nazis said:
“No, actually we don’t care about any creature with blood in it. We just want to pave the earth with data centres and upload our Aryan brains into the cloud.”
It’s like Nazis said:
“No, actually we don’t care about any creature with blood in it. We just want to pave the earth with data centres and upload our Aryan brains into the cloud.”
October 27, 2025 at 5:33 AM
The most extreme form of eugenics ideology.
It’s like Nazis said:
“No, actually we don’t care about any creature with blood in it. We just want to pave the earth with data centres and upload our Aryan brains into the cloud.”
It’s like Nazis said:
“No, actually we don’t care about any creature with blood in it. We just want to pave the earth with data centres and upload our Aryan brains into the cloud.”
A tech supervillain comic that blurs the edges with real life.
Anyone thought of doing this? I'd love to see the rebel movements sketched out! The skeptics, the luddites, the confused doomers
Could draw characters from old sci-fi books. The two-faced character of Musk would do well as Beeblebrox.
Anyone thought of doing this? I'd love to see the rebel movements sketched out! The skeptics, the luddites, the confused doomers
Could draw characters from old sci-fi books. The two-faced character of Musk would do well as Beeblebrox.
October 27, 2025 at 2:29 AM
A tech supervillain comic that blurs the edges with real life.
Anyone thought of doing this? I'd love to see the rebel movements sketched out! The skeptics, the luddites, the confused doomers
Could draw characters from old sci-fi books. The two-faced character of Musk would do well as Beeblebrox.
Anyone thought of doing this? I'd love to see the rebel movements sketched out! The skeptics, the luddites, the confused doomers
Could draw characters from old sci-fi books. The two-faced character of Musk would do well as Beeblebrox.
Here’s the page from the court document btw:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
October 26, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Here’s the page from the court document btw:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Scary how folks don’t read and think. Instead they pray for truth at the altar of tech.
Reactions to page from Annie Altman’s court document (detailing years of rape):
“@grok, is this true, explain it like your talking to a 5 year old”
“Is there a place to validate on chain that they are legit?”
Reactions to page from Annie Altman’s court document (detailing years of rape):
“@grok, is this true, explain it like your talking to a 5 year old”
“Is there a place to validate on chain that they are legit?”
October 26, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Scary how folks don’t read and think. Instead they pray for truth at the altar of tech.
Reactions to page from Annie Altman’s court document (detailing years of rape):
“@grok, is this true, explain it like your talking to a 5 year old”
“Is there a place to validate on chain that they are legit?”
Reactions to page from Annie Altman’s court document (detailing years of rape):
“@grok, is this true, explain it like your talking to a 5 year old”
“Is there a place to validate on chain that they are legit?”
This was an insightful listen! I’m curious for what formats of being together and of collective inquiry we could create to orient around technologies – and delegate action in service of nature and culture, and in turn for our lives.
Regarding abstraction, here’s an interesting quote from my mentor:
Regarding abstraction, here’s an interesting quote from my mentor:
October 20, 2025 at 3:07 PM
This was an insightful listen! I’m curious for what formats of being together and of collective inquiry we could create to orient around technologies – and delegate action in service of nature and culture, and in turn for our lives.
Regarding abstraction, here’s an interesting quote from my mentor:
Regarding abstraction, here’s an interesting quote from my mentor:
I see the original quote is from Ephantus from the Data Labelers Association:
www.dawn.com/news/1949310
They’re in need of money to offer training to data workers so they know how to get a proper contract and to refuse unethical work.
www.dawn.com/news/1949310
They’re in need of money to offer training to data workers so they know how to get a proper contract and to refuse unethical work.
October 20, 2025 at 2:46 AM
I see the original quote is from Ephantus from the Data Labelers Association:
www.dawn.com/news/1949310
They’re in need of money to offer training to data workers so they know how to get a proper contract and to refuse unethical work.
www.dawn.com/news/1949310
They’re in need of money to offer training to data workers so they know how to get a proper contract and to refuse unethical work.
What an overblown ego has Eliezer built up.
I used to think he was a serious thinker, listening to what friends in the rational community told me.
Fun fact: he got basic aspects of evolution wrong that were covered in the evolution course he himself pointed to.
I used to think he was a serious thinker, listening to what friends in the rational community told me.
Fun fact: he got basic aspects of evolution wrong that were covered in the evolution course he himself pointed to.
October 20, 2025 at 2:18 AM
What an overblown ego has Eliezer built up.
I used to think he was a serious thinker, listening to what friends in the rational community told me.
Fun fact: he got basic aspects of evolution wrong that were covered in the evolution course he himself pointed to.
I used to think he was a serious thinker, listening to what friends in the rational community told me.
Fun fact: he got basic aspects of evolution wrong that were covered in the evolution course he himself pointed to.
Woah, this speech is on fire.
October 19, 2025 at 5:34 PM
Woah, this speech is on fire.
Sam will continue to push for climate collapse, while musing about his ‘ASI’ saviour.
All these manipulative conmen know each other. I didn’t even know of the Shellenberger connection yet
All these manipulative conmen know each other. I didn’t even know of the Shellenberger connection yet
October 18, 2025 at 12:59 PM
Sam will continue to push for climate collapse, while musing about his ‘ASI’ saviour.
All these manipulative conmen know each other. I didn’t even know of the Shellenberger connection yet
All these manipulative conmen know each other. I didn’t even know of the Shellenberger connection yet
Here I worked for years to discredit a bonkers idea:
That *if* a fully autonomous AI system would *ever* develop through capitalist exploitation and replacement of workers, that such a system could even be *theoretically* controlled to stay safe.
1/
That *if* a fully autonomous AI system would *ever* develop through capitalist exploitation and replacement of workers, that such a system could even be *theoretically* controlled to stay safe.
1/
![Where I strongly disagree with the authors is on the question of whether ASI can ever be controlled. Yudkowsky and Soares believe controllability is feasible if Al safety research leads the way over Al capabilities research. "The ASI alignment problem," they write, "is possible to solve in principle." But I see no reason for accepting this claim (and they provide no convincing reasons for believing it). How could we possibly ensure that a dynamic, constantly evolving cluster of self-improving algorithms remains under our control for more than a flash? As the computer scientist Roman Yampolskiy compellingly makes the point:
We don't have static software. We have a system which is dynamically learning, changing, rewriting code indefinitely. It's a perpetual motion problem we're trying to solve. We know in physics you cannot create [al perpetual motion device. But in Al, in computer science, we're saying we can create [a] perpetual safety device, which will always guarantee that the new iteration is just as safe.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wwoynpmtuwhhfus356bnkz7w/bafkreids3p7ygnpixpeu2yciwtzfyym6eq7s2altkgntrlsjwl4iejyqea@jpeg)
October 18, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Here I worked for years to discredit a bonkers idea:
That *if* a fully autonomous AI system would *ever* develop through capitalist exploitation and replacement of workers, that such a system could even be *theoretically* controlled to stay safe.
1/
That *if* a fully autonomous AI system would *ever* develop through capitalist exploitation and replacement of workers, that such a system could even be *theoretically* controlled to stay safe.
1/