Always a good sign when a complaint huffily references a coexistence agreement but doesn't (a) cite the terms or (b) actually allege the complained-of conduct breaches those terms 🙃

this goes with the dolans using facial recognition to detect and ban from their venues lawyers who are employed by firms suing them

my erudite opinion is that it's giving "evil mode"

p surprising that it took until 2023 to reach a coexistent agreement!

validating the axiom, "machines don't replace workers. cartoon dog bosses chomping cigars replace workers"

This notice seems to state wrongly that the "entering unlawfully" fine applies to anyone who *previously* entered unlawfully and is "later encountered in the interior of the United States"—but the statute (Sec. 1325(b)(1)) requires they be "apprehended while entering." Is that a fair reading?

One confusion created with the division: he's at a loss to identify an independent purpose to amassing the "central library," if not LLM dev. It's like he assumed that AI developers wanted a Borgesian universal repository just *cuz*. Then held "idk no reason" is not a valid factor 1 purpose

fucking heavens, lol

oh yeah man how's the securities class action going! i just billed 0.4 hours screenshotting the phrase "DISCLAIMER: NO OVHOES WERE HARMED DURING THE MAKING OF THIS VIDEO." had to get the close-up shot too

Having encountered turkeys in person for the first time after moving to Cambridge, I can reliably confirm that those birds merit no interaction with the justice system beyond a few warranted traffic violations.

(assuming this one) iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewD...

Do you know if the Concord hearing will be publicly available? I can't quite tell from Judge Lee's website.