Mr. Biswas
@arifarshad.bsky.social
Reposted by Mr. Biswas
When the Supreme Court struck down Biden's policies, it was tempting to think: "At least these limits on executive authority will bind Trump if he comes back into office." But no—the court's skepticism of executive power vanished on Jan. 20, 2025. This dynamic is obvious to anyone paying attention!
October 9, 2025 at 2:50 PM
When the Supreme Court struck down Biden's policies, it was tempting to think: "At least these limits on executive authority will bind Trump if he comes back into office." But no—the court's skepticism of executive power vanished on Jan. 20, 2025. This dynamic is obvious to anyone paying attention!
Reposted by Mr. Biswas
I really appreciate Justice Jackson contrasting the lower courts' meticulous and responsible approach to judging—extensive deliberations, written opinions—with the Supreme Court's slapdash, unreasoned work over the shadow docket. www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
October 3, 2025 at 8:45 PM
I really appreciate Justice Jackson contrasting the lower courts' meticulous and responsible approach to judging—extensive deliberations, written opinions—with the Supreme Court's slapdash, unreasoned work over the shadow docket. www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
Reposted by Mr. Biswas
Justice Jackson's sharp dissent accuses her Republican-appointed colleagues of abusing the court's shadow docket "to allow this Administration to disrupt as many lives as possible, as quickly as possible." She also takes a dig at their refusal to write opinions explaining their actions.
October 3, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Justice Jackson's sharp dissent accuses her Republican-appointed colleagues of abusing the court's shadow docket "to allow this Administration to disrupt as many lives as possible, as quickly as possible." She also takes a dig at their refusal to write opinions explaining their actions.
Reposted by Mr. Biswas
Really important that district judges keep applying the law as best as they can interpret it and not worry about what SCOTUS is going to say (or not say! - in their often unsigned, unreasoned orders)
September 8, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Really important that district judges keep applying the law as best as they can interpret it and not worry about what SCOTUS is going to say (or not say! - in their often unsigned, unreasoned orders)