@aries1313.bsky.social
Reposted
Since some are confused:
1. SCOTUS did not hold that Trump is immune from prosecution for anything at all that he does.
2. Even if it had (and it did not) we must name all his crimes.
3. Nothing SCOTUS has or could hold prevents Congress from impeaching and removing any President, for any reason.
1. SCOTUS did not hold that Trump is immune from prosecution for anything at all that he does.
2. Even if it had (and it did not) we must name all his crimes.
3. Nothing SCOTUS has or could hold prevents Congress from impeaching and removing any President, for any reason.
January 5, 2026 at 10:14 PM
Since some are confused:
1. SCOTUS did not hold that Trump is immune from prosecution for anything at all that he does.
2. Even if it had (and it did not) we must name all his crimes.
3. Nothing SCOTUS has or could hold prevents Congress from impeaching and removing any President, for any reason.
1. SCOTUS did not hold that Trump is immune from prosecution for anything at all that he does.
2. Even if it had (and it did not) we must name all his crimes.
3. Nothing SCOTUS has or could hold prevents Congress from impeaching and removing any President, for any reason.