Sure because she lost so badly because she and the democrats were so out of touch with voting Americans. But that doesn't make her awrong.

Not mine.

There is no constitutional exclusion from felons holding that office. I suppose at the time nobody imagined that a sane electorate would ever select one.

Yes. And yet several judges that his prior administration appointed have ruled against him. So now it becomes an issue of who will enforce a Federal Court order. Pam Bondi? LOL

Step 1 in the transition to authoritarianism is taking control of the government. Seems mostly done. Step 2 is find an easily identifiable group of people to demonize and blame for everything. That's checked off. The next step will be to muzzle the media - well underway.

With both houses of congress having surrendered to him and abdicated their responsibility to govern, all we have left is the courts. And they are looking shaking.

Everyone makes mistakes. Only honest people and businesses admit it.

Brown people? Wow. What a moron!

Yes, but this is only compelling to people who already agree with you.

Where was the media outrage?

There is no constitutional prohibition of it. Presumable because the framers felt it was unimaginable. The real question is how do people who think of themselves as true patriots vote for a felon.

I'm about over Fakebook too. I'll see how this goes.