Findings: humans judge harshly people who didn't take the socially common level of precautions, even though textbook says that shouldn't matter.

Textbook does say they should care about costs, but humans don't care much.

LLM repeat this exact pattern in RCTs. (but not all)

To test whether LLMs may have picked up the deeper structure of reasonableness judgment (not just parroting), I offer a new methodology: Silicon RCTs (S-RCTs).

Randomize a relevant fact, run session-isolated “participants,” & compare LLM deltas to human deltas.

I ended up using Walt. I attach the semester plan. I was underwhelmed but it was serviceable

Oh wow