Moreover, the gestation resulting from consented sexual activity need not be terminated because one party decides to unilaterally revoke that consent. That would be very unfair. Think about it.

You are misinterpreting 2A. It doesn't equate an 'unwanted' fetus to an "undocumented immigrant," nor does it give the right to automatically use 'lethel force' to 'expel' (abort) it.

I am not asking for preference for my views. But it is best, in the interest of civil discourse, to consider alternate points of view just to figure out the truth.

There are no constitutional laws against abortion. No laws exist against abortion. It has just been sent to the people to decide what they want. It is fair.

There are no 'undocumented immigrants', only foreign infiltrators. 'Immigration' without equal rights is slavery by proxy.

Just want to say, it is just that the decisions on this issue will be made by the people of individual states. I see no 'assault' on rights to abortion. If anything, I feel that right has only been reiterated.

I think it is not a bad idea to hear other points of view! How else would we know what the truth is?