Julian Arato
@aratojulian.bsky.social
Professor of Law, University of Michigan
International law, trade, investment, contracts, corporations, etc
International law, trade, investment, contracts, corporations, etc
This is world class commentary 🙇🏻♂️ I am in awe
November 8, 2025 at 7:03 PM
This is world class commentary 🙇🏻♂️ I am in awe
That’s a top tier rule. “comparative advantage” level
November 6, 2025 at 3:17 PM
That’s a top tier rule. “comparative advantage” level
I think the much stronger claim is that *this* statute just did not entail that delegation. As compared to many other statutes that do delegate tariff authority, explicitly and under relatively precise conditions - including for national security (section 232)
That seems like the heart of it to me
That seems like the heart of it to me
November 5, 2025 at 4:57 PM
I think the much stronger claim is that *this* statute just did not entail that delegation. As compared to many other statutes that do delegate tariff authority, explicitly and under relatively precise conditions - including for national security (section 232)
That seems like the heart of it to me
That seems like the heart of it to me
Love the literature you guys are pushing out!
November 4, 2025 at 10:21 PM
Love the literature you guys are pushing out!
Reposted by Julian Arato
For more, see my latest over at EJIL Talk! www.ejiltalk.org/the-ilos-rig... End
The ILO’s Right to Strike: Distinguishing Non-Binding Principles from Binding Conventions at the ICJ
From 6-8 October, 2025, the International Court of Justice held public hearings in response to the International Labour Organization (ILO)’s request for an advisory opinion on the following question: ...
www.ejiltalk.org
October 20, 2025 at 2:16 PM
For more, see my latest over at EJIL Talk! www.ejiltalk.org/the-ilos-rig... End
Same. I know it’s about Ozzy rn (RIP) but that’s a lick for the ages.
July 23, 2025 at 11:47 PM
Same. I know it’s about Ozzy rn (RIP) but that’s a lick for the ages.
Some very important conclusions on attribution, plural responsibility, plural invocation, etc., all designed to avoid shrugging off responsibility through gaming the rules of state responsibility (ARSIWA)
July 23, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Some very important conclusions on attribution, plural responsibility, plural invocation, etc., all designed to avoid shrugging off responsibility through gaming the rules of state responsibility (ARSIWA)
I agree. V important.
July 23, 2025 at 2:28 PM
I agree. V important.
Sure did. There was a “not necessarily” wiggle room in there but, yes.
July 23, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Sure did. There was a “not necessarily” wiggle room in there but, yes.
And CT seems to have said lack of cooperation re the treaties raises demand on states to demonstrate they are complying with customary IL
Thus custom and treaty exist in a dynamic relationship in operationalization - not just interpretation.
An imp litigation tool, even in national ct litigation
Thus custom and treaty exist in a dynamic relationship in operationalization - not just interpretation.
An imp litigation tool, even in national ct litigation
July 23, 2025 at 2:19 PM
And CT seems to have said lack of cooperation re the treaties raises demand on states to demonstrate they are complying with customary IL
Thus custom and treaty exist in a dynamic relationship in operationalization - not just interpretation.
An imp litigation tool, even in national ct litigation
Thus custom and treaty exist in a dynamic relationship in operationalization - not just interpretation.
An imp litigation tool, even in national ct litigation