Adam Davis
@arahnd.bsky.social
Will leaguepass get you the games on peacock?
July 25, 2025 at 3:34 AM
Will leaguepass get you the games on peacock?
And a religious southerner as well. He should be our Zelenskyy.
July 18, 2025 at 3:10 AM
And a religious southerner as well. He should be our Zelenskyy.
And I’ll be in CT in a few weeks.
If you’re going to Yosemite I’d highly recommend Tioga pass rather than the valley. The high country is sublime.
If you’re going to Yosemite I’d highly recommend Tioga pass rather than the valley. The high country is sublime.
July 12, 2025 at 10:07 PM
And I’ll be in CT in a few weeks.
If you’re going to Yosemite I’d highly recommend Tioga pass rather than the valley. The high country is sublime.
If you’re going to Yosemite I’d highly recommend Tioga pass rather than the valley. The high country is sublime.
We just left Yosemite today. Welcome to Cali!
July 12, 2025 at 7:28 PM
We just left Yosemite today. Welcome to Cali!
Why can’t they use bird rights?
June 30, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Why can’t they use bird rights?
Unusual day for me:
Wordle 1,472 3/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Wordle 1,472 3/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
June 30, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Unusual day for me:
Wordle 1,472 3/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Wordle 1,472 3/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Also feels like they may be collecting future 2nds to help get off Simon’s and Giang’s contracts. We were getting a bit low on the future 2nd’s cupboard.
June 27, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Also feels like they may be collecting future 2nds to help get off Simon’s and Giang’s contracts. We were getting a bit low on the future 2nd’s cupboard.
This isn’t at all like RFk jr or other grifters. This is honest academic debate with unknown answers.
June 26, 2025 at 1:19 PM
This isn’t at all like RFk jr or other grifters. This is honest academic debate with unknown answers.
I’m not arguing her analysis was right. I’m arguing that your and other’s critique of her isn’t being fair to what her intent was. I think academics should argue and try to figure out cost effectiveness of different interventions. Then if you’re wrong you update your model in a genuine way.
June 26, 2025 at 1:18 PM
I’m not arguing her analysis was right. I’m arguing that your and other’s critique of her isn’t being fair to what her intent was. I think academics should argue and try to figure out cost effectiveness of different interventions. Then if you’re wrong you update your model in a genuine way.
But implying that she wanted to save money and let people die is unfair. She was trying to make a claim for what would be the most effective use of a set amount of money to save the most lives.
June 26, 2025 at 1:14 PM
But implying that she wanted to save money and let people die is unfair. She was trying to make a claim for what would be the most effective use of a set amount of money to save the most lives.
So she was wrong on parts of her analysis (especially that the dollar amount was not fixed). And it’s fair to critique her and it would be interesting to see what she would say about it now in retrospect. Clearly the PEPFAR project has been a unique force of good.
June 26, 2025 at 1:13 PM
So she was wrong on parts of her analysis (especially that the dollar amount was not fixed). And it’s fair to critique her and it would be interesting to see what she would say about it now in retrospect. Clearly the PEPFAR project has been a unique force of good.
Now, turns out the dollars weren’t indifferent to what they paid for and paying for treatment was politically attractive and brought more money to the project. And that also ended up lowering the cost of treatment which was a virtuous cycle.
June 26, 2025 at 1:10 PM
Now, turns out the dollars weren’t indifferent to what they paid for and paying for treatment was politically attractive and brought more money to the project. And that also ended up lowering the cost of treatment which was a virtuous cycle.
I don’t think this is a fair critique of what she wrote or stated. She argued that compared to prevention methods treatment was not cost effective and so if you were going to spend x number of dollars than using x on prevention would save more lives.
June 26, 2025 at 1:09 PM
I don’t think this is a fair critique of what she wrote or stated. She argued that compared to prevention methods treatment was not cost effective and so if you were going to spend x number of dollars than using x on prevention would save more lives.
I mean I think it seems possible to keep Tatum/Brown/White/Pritchard core, reset tax and not give up any real draft assets which I think sounded unlikely before offseason. Maybe even keep Kornet. Just need to get off the new salaries which seems doable.
June 25, 2025 at 1:58 PM
I mean I think it seems possible to keep Tatum/Brown/White/Pritchard core, reset tax and not give up any real draft assets which I think sounded unlikely before offseason. Maybe even keep Kornet. Just need to get off the new salaries which seems doable.
100%. Try to move Simons and Niang. See if we can create enough space to make room for Kornet and Horford. If not move Hauser too. Well done Brad.
June 24, 2025 at 11:03 PM
100%. Try to move Simons and Niang. See if we can create enough space to make room for Kornet and Horford. If not move Hauser too. Well done Brad.
Ooh, I’d love more sports and comedy and joy on this app. What actual changes would you suggest the developers make to balance out the vibes? I barely ever post so I’m not bothered by the reply guys directly, but I want more migration so more of the voices I enjoy are here.
June 23, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Ooh, I’d love more sports and comedy and joy on this app. What actual changes would you suggest the developers make to balance out the vibes? I barely ever post so I’m not bothered by the reply guys directly, but I want more migration so more of the voices I enjoy are here.
It is more complicated than simple plurality but it reflects the electorates preferences much better.
June 16, 2025 at 3:09 AM
It is more complicated than simple plurality but it reflects the electorates preferences much better.
I don’t think it’s all that complicated. If you are anyone but X you can just rank the top 5 polling candidates that aren’t x in your order of preference. In fact you likely only need to get the top 2 non-x candidates and whatever other 3 you like in your order of preference.
June 16, 2025 at 3:08 AM
I don’t think it’s all that complicated. If you are anyone but X you can just rank the top 5 polling candidates that aren’t x in your order of preference. In fact you likely only need to get the top 2 non-x candidates and whatever other 3 you like in your order of preference.
An incredibly beautiful meditation.
June 1, 2025 at 7:10 PM
An incredibly beautiful meditation.
Since it was a unanimous vote wouldn't it be easy to override the veto?
May 30, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Since it was a unanimous vote wouldn't it be easy to override the veto?
If 25% of trump voters flipped their vote to Dem that would've been the largest popular vote margin since 1936. 25% is enormous.
May 27, 2025 at 3:47 AM
If 25% of trump voters flipped their vote to Dem that would've been the largest popular vote margin since 1936. 25% is enormous.
Not sure that I trust these voters would actually switch their vote next time, but if they all did that would be 60.8% dem to 37.4% gop. That would be the largest popular vote victory since FDR in 1936.
May 27, 2025 at 3:44 AM
Not sure that I trust these voters would actually switch their vote next time, but if they all did that would be 60.8% dem to 37.4% gop. That would be the largest popular vote victory since FDR in 1936.
This misses that Dems approvals have not been improving. Trump is losing popularity but Dems because of their failure to respond to the moment have been unable to increase they're approval. Shouldn't be hard in this environment, but Schumer is utterly failing.
May 19, 2025 at 9:37 PM
This misses that Dems approvals have not been improving. Trump is losing popularity but Dems because of their failure to respond to the moment have been unable to increase they're approval. Shouldn't be hard in this environment, but Schumer is utterly failing.