Andrew Valentine
apvalentine.bsky.social
Andrew Valentine
@apvalentine.bsky.social
Assoc. Prof., Durham University
Inverse theory, ML, seismology, geophysics & computation.
https://valentineap.github.io/
In particular, if we have already run McMC for each state individually, Carlin & Chib's approach lets us build a trans-conceptual ensemble by resampling the resulting ensembles.

Go read doi.org/10.1029/2024... to find out more and see some examples of this idea applied to real problems!

(4/4)
August 27, 2025 at 12:59 PM
An alternative comes from the work of Carlin & Chib (1999). Instead of working across multiple different parameter spaces, combine them all into a single 'product space'. Of course, this increases the dimension of the search space (= bad), but in practice some simplification may be possible.

(3/4)
August 27, 2025 at 12:59 PM
In some cases this problem can be tackled using reversible-jump McMC (Green, 1995) to switch between the different physical theories (or 'conceptual states'). See, e.g., 'trans-dimensional' sampling. However, this requires us to know the Jacobian of the transformation between states...

(2/4)
August 27, 2025 at 12:59 PM
🧪 Monte Carlo methods can help characterise unknown parameters within a physical model. But what if we have multiple competing physical theories? Trans-conceptual sampling may be the answer...

Just out in JGR, w/M. Sambridge & J. Hauser: doi.org/10.1029/2024...

@durhamearthsci.bsky.social

(1/4)
August 27, 2025 at 12:59 PM