Apprentice Citizen
@apprenticeciti.bsky.social
Are you sure, Mehdi?
Iran has historically had one: AMAD
The IAEA found strong evidence of Iran refining uranium to purities well beyond the needs of civilian use
And their stockpiling of uranium accelerated sharply since Israel disabled Hezbollah
www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder...
Iran has historically had one: AMAD
The IAEA found strong evidence of Iran refining uranium to purities well beyond the needs of civilian use
And their stockpiling of uranium accelerated sharply since Israel disabled Hezbollah
www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder...
June 17, 2025 at 5:48 AM
Are you sure, Mehdi?
Iran has historically had one: AMAD
The IAEA found strong evidence of Iran refining uranium to purities well beyond the needs of civilian use
And their stockpiling of uranium accelerated sharply since Israel disabled Hezbollah
www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder...
Iran has historically had one: AMAD
The IAEA found strong evidence of Iran refining uranium to purities well beyond the needs of civilian use
And their stockpiling of uranium accelerated sharply since Israel disabled Hezbollah
www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder...
“Brutal for Trump” misses the point a bit.
Trump’s point with these deeds is not to get courts to approve them.
It’s to get them normalized in the eyes of public opinion. At which point, courts become the boogie men.
And it’s working.
Trump’s point with these deeds is not to get courts to approve them.
It’s to get them normalized in the eyes of public opinion. At which point, courts become the boogie men.
And it’s working.
May 24, 2025 at 9:20 PM
“Brutal for Trump” misses the point a bit.
Trump’s point with these deeds is not to get courts to approve them.
It’s to get them normalized in the eyes of public opinion. At which point, courts become the boogie men.
And it’s working.
Trump’s point with these deeds is not to get courts to approve them.
It’s to get them normalized in the eyes of public opinion. At which point, courts become the boogie men.
And it’s working.
We now have @anderspucknielsen.dk ‘s take on this too:
“The likelihood of [..] by accident is therefore close to zero.
The likelihood of this happening three times in 14 months in the same area is even smaller.
[..] therefore, straightforward: Yes, this was definitely sabotage.”
“The likelihood of [..] by accident is therefore close to zero.
The likelihood of this happening three times in 14 months in the same area is even smaller.
[..] therefore, straightforward: Yes, this was definitely sabotage.”
January 22, 2025 at 7:42 PM
We now have @anderspucknielsen.dk ‘s take on this too:
“The likelihood of [..] by accident is therefore close to zero.
The likelihood of this happening three times in 14 months in the same area is even smaller.
[..] therefore, straightforward: Yes, this was definitely sabotage.”
“The likelihood of [..] by accident is therefore close to zero.
The likelihood of this happening three times in 14 months in the same area is even smaller.
[..] therefore, straightforward: Yes, this was definitely sabotage.”
This is false.
There is longstanding scientific consensus since that climate change is influenced by many factors, with human activity as one of its dominant drivers.
climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/...
There is longstanding scientific consensus since that climate change is influenced by many factors, with human activity as one of its dominant drivers.
climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/...
January 22, 2025 at 7:34 PM
This is false.
There is longstanding scientific consensus since that climate change is influenced by many factors, with human activity as one of its dominant drivers.
climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/...
There is longstanding scientific consensus since that climate change is influenced by many factors, with human activity as one of its dominant drivers.
climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/...
Careful when marveling at Norway upon pro-capita rankings.
It’s a petrostate with a tiny population.
- Half the GDP comes from natural resource extraction
- oil employs <5% of workforce
A Norwegian newborn owns 300k+ $ in sovereign wealth fund before working a minute of their life.
It’s a petrostate with a tiny population.
- Half the GDP comes from natural resource extraction
- oil employs <5% of workforce
A Norwegian newborn owns 300k+ $ in sovereign wealth fund before working a minute of their life.
January 2, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Careful when marveling at Norway upon pro-capita rankings.
It’s a petrostate with a tiny population.
- Half the GDP comes from natural resource extraction
- oil employs <5% of workforce
A Norwegian newborn owns 300k+ $ in sovereign wealth fund before working a minute of their life.
It’s a petrostate with a tiny population.
- Half the GDP comes from natural resource extraction
- oil employs <5% of workforce
A Norwegian newborn owns 300k+ $ in sovereign wealth fund before working a minute of their life.
Here’s RUB vs USD — last 20 years.
And USD vs a rock-stable currency for comparison.
The Ruble is indeed in free fall, in relative and absolute terms.
And USD vs a rock-stable currency for comparison.
The Ruble is indeed in free fall, in relative and absolute terms.
December 29, 2024 at 6:46 PM
Here’s RUB vs USD — last 20 years.
And USD vs a rock-stable currency for comparison.
The Ruble is indeed in free fall, in relative and absolute terms.
And USD vs a rock-stable currency for comparison.
The Ruble is indeed in free fall, in relative and absolute terms.
December 7, 2024 at 9:42 PM